Skip to main content

Security report for metsa.com

Metsa · Energy · Mexico

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Metsa is a company specializing in the manufacturing and distribution of propane tanks, skid station tanks, and pressure vessel accessories, primarily targeting the North American market. The website presents a professional and focused business offering high-quality products in the energy sector. The digital infrastructure is built on the Wix platform, leveraging standard Wix technologies and popular marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. While the website is well-designed and mobile-optimized, it lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and some hardening scripts, but the absence of explicit security headers and incident response information is a gap. The most significant concern is the lack of WHOIS registration data for the domain www.metsa.com, which raises questions about domain legitimacy and ownership. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in privacy compliance and domain registration transparency to enhance trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching metsa.com

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
70

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Metsa operates in the energy sector, focusing on propane tanks and related accessories. The business model appears to be manufacturing and direct sales or distribution. The target audience includes businesses and individuals requiring propane storage solutions. The company positions itself as a supplier of high-quality North American products, which suggests a focus on quality and regional market trust. The website content is relevant and consistent with this positioning. However, the lack of WHOIS data and absence of detailed business credentials or certifications limits the ability to fully assess market standing and growth potential. The use of Wix indicates a small to medium-sized enterprise with moderate digital maturity. Marketing efforts include standard tracking and retargeting tools, but no advanced affiliate or partner programs are evident.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. Wix's Thunderbolt platform includes scripts that harden fetch and XHR requests, enhancing client-side security. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could mitigate certain web attacks. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or incident response contact information, which are important for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a critical red flag, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not disclosed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding security headers, privacy documentation, and clarifying domain registration status.

Recommendations

  1. Add a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Clarify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is properly registered and publicly available.
  4. Provide incident response contact information and security policy details on the website.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Metsa
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Metsa
Description
Propane Tanks, Skid Station Tanks and Pressure vessel accessories from high quality North American Products.
Key services
Propane Tanks, Skid Station Tanks, Pressure vessel accessories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, MarketingCloudFX
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Fetch and XHR hardened by Wix Thunderbolt scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Analytics, LinkedIn Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, MarketingCloudFX
Marketing tools
MarketingCloudFX
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and tracking.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to phone number and address in structured data only.
  4. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. No email addresses or social media links explicitly found in the content.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain not registered, which is suspicious.
  7. HTTPS is enabled with good SSL configuration.
  8. Tracking and marketing scripts are present, but privacy compliance is weak.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  10. Content is relevant and professionally presented for propane tanks business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing Wix's Thunderbolt runtime and standard Wix libraries. It uses modern JavaScript and CSS with polyfills for legacy browser support. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts. The site is mobile-optimized and includes basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present, but no advanced SEO structured data beyond basic JSON-LD for local business and website. Hosting is managed by Wix, providing reliable uptime and SSL. The technical stack is suitable for a small to medium business but lacks advanced customization or enterprise-grade features. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility, SEO, and security headers to enhance overall technical quality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with metsa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review metsa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.