Skip to main content

Security report for metrima.se

Metrima AB · Energy · Sweden

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

29/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Metrima AB operates as a specialized supplier of Automatic Meter Reading (AMR) systems, focusing on smart metering solutions primarily for electricity, district heating, water, and cooling meters. Their flagship product, MActor, provides a flexible and cost-efficient communication platform supporting multiple meter manufacturers, positioning them as a reliable player in the energy metering sector in Sweden. The company emphasizes open, future-proof systems with backward compatibility, supported by ISO certifications (ISO-9001, ISO-14001, ISO-45001) that reinforce their commitment to quality and environmental standards. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap framework, delivering a moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. The site is accessible and well-structured, though it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens, but lacks explicit security headers and a visible privacy policy, which are areas for improvement. No tracking or analytics scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking and a privacy-conscious approach. Overall, the security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but compliance gaps exist, particularly regarding privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of contact information on the homepage limits direct communication channels, which could impact user trust and support responsiveness. The domain WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness. Strategically, Metrima should prioritize publishing a comprehensive privacy policy, implementing cookie consent mechanisms, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact information to improve compliance and user trust. These steps will strengthen their security posture and align with GDPR requirements, supporting sustainable business growth.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching metrima.se

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
0
Average
29

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Metrima AB is positioned as a niche provider in the energy sector, delivering AMR solutions that cater to utilities and energy companies requiring smart metering technologies. Their competitive advantage lies in offering an open and flexible system (MActor) that supports multiple meter manufacturers and communication protocols, appealing to customers seeking cost-effective and future-proof metering solutions. The company’s ISO certifications enhance credibility and market acceptance. The business model focuses on supplying hardware and software solutions for meter reading, likely generating revenue through system sales, installations, and support services. The website’s limited marketing and absence of social media presence suggest a focused B2B approach rather than broad consumer outreach. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the website, indicating a standalone operation or a small company scale. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the stable domain and certifications imply an established presence in the Swedish energy metering market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and CSRF tokens implemented, which protect against common web vulnerabilities. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth and exposes the site to potential clickjacking or MIME sniffing attacks. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected, and no incident response or security contact information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security events. GDPR compliance is partial due to the lack of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, despite minimal tracking practices. Overall, the security culture appears basic but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy to meet GDPR and user transparency requirements.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with EU cookie laws and enhance user trust.
  3. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve security posture.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident contacts to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Metrima AB
Description
Metrima is a complete AMR (Automatic Meter Reading) supplier offering smart metering solutions with a central system called MActor that supports multiple meter manufacturers and communication methods. They focus on electricity, district heating, water, and cooling meter installations.
Key services
AMR system supply, Communication and data collection solutions, MActor central system
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Bootstrap 5.3.2, JavaScript ES5 and modules
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • CSRF token present in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy policy page found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie policy is present but lacks a consent mechanism.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly listed on the homepage.
  5. Website uses Joomla CMS with Bootstrap framework.
  6. ISO certifications are prominently linked, enhancing trust.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  8. No social media or external marketing links present.
  9. Security headers are not detected in the provided data; improvement needed.
  10. Content is professionally presented but limited in scope and depth.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap 5.3.2, using both ES5 and module JavaScript scripts. The technical implementation is stable but basic, with moderate performance and limited SEO and accessibility features. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, but lacks advanced security headers. The content is well structured with language alternates and meta tags, but no structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph tags were found. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The site could benefit from modernization efforts including improved mobile responsiveness, enhanced SEO metadata, and adoption of security best practices to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with metrima.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review metrima.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.