Skip to main content

Security report for metka.cc

Metka · Finance · Russia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Metka is a Russian-based online service specializing in electronic currency and cryptocurrency wallet top-ups. The platform supports over 50 types of cryptocurrencies and multiple fiat currencies, offering users a convenient and secure way to fund their wallets around the clock. The website is built using modern frontend technologies such as Vue.js and Nuxt.js, with integrated analytics via Yandex Metrika and customer support through JivoSite chat. The business targets crypto users and investors seeking reliable exchange and wallet funding services. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are absent. Privacy and cookie policies exist but are basic in scope. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front for a small finance-focused business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching metka.cc

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Metka operates in the finance sector, focusing on cryptocurrency and electronic currency services. Its business model revolves around providing wallet top-up services with competitive exchange rates and a broad currency selection. The company emphasizes user security and support, partnering with reliable fiat providers. Market positioning is that of a niche service catering to Russian-speaking crypto users. The website content and design reflect a consistent brand image with trust signals such as customer reviews and partner listings. However, direct contact details and advanced compliance disclosures are limited, suggesting a small to medium-sized operation with room for growth in transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and several security headers in place. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in comprehensive security governance. The site uses secure forms but lacks explicit details on data protection officer contacts or certifications. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business scale but could be improved with formalized policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Develop and publish a detailed security policy including incident response procedures.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file.
  3. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for support and security issues.
  4. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data retention.
  5. Improve SEO and accessibility features to increase reach and usability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Metka
Description
Мультивалютный сервис, позволяющий безопасно пополнять кошелек более чем 50 видами криптовалюты и фиатных валют по выгодному курсу круглосуточно.
Key services
Пополнение кошельков криптовалютой и фиатными валютами, Калькулятор обмена, Партнерская программа
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Swiper.js, Yandex Metrika, JivoSite chat widget
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
JivoSite chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian language targeting Russian-speaking users.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic in detail.
  5. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  6. No explicit security incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies found.
  7. Business appears small but professional with focus on crypto and fiat wallet top-ups.
  8. Use of modern frontend technologies (Vue/Nuxt) and analytics tools (Yandex Metrika).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework stack (Vue.js and Nuxt.js) with responsive design and integration of third-party analytics and chat widgets. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site uses standard security headers and HTTPS, indicating good baseline security practices. No CMS detected, suggesting a custom-built platform. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Technical debt appears low but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO optimizations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with metka.cc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review metka.cc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.