Skip to main content

Security report for meteopress.cz

Meteopress s. r. o. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Meteopress s. r. o. operates a comprehensive Czech weather forecasting website providing current weather conditions, hourly and 14-day forecasts, meteoradar data, webcams, and meteorological articles. The company targets the general public in the Czech Republic interested in weather information and related media content. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern frontend technologies such as SvelteKit and ES modules, integrated video streaming, and social media engagement. The content is rich, professionally presented, and well-structured for user experience and SEO. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure; however, the absence of security headers and WHOIS data transparency are areas for improvement. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear GDPR compliant, supporting user trust and regulatory adherence. Overall, the website is a reliable and professional source for meteorological information in the Czech market.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of meteopress.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching meteopress.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Meteopress holds a solid position in the Czech meteorological media sector, offering a broad range of weather-related services including forecasts, radar data, and educational articles. The business model focuses on providing free public weather information with additional business services accessible via a dedicated section. The company leverages partnerships and EU funding as indicated by logos in the footer. Its competitive advantage lies in the integration of meteoradar technology and expert meteorological content. The target audience is broad, encompassing general consumers and business clients. The website's content volume and quality indicate a medium-sized operation with consistent branding and trust signals such as social media presence and HTTPS security. The lack of visible direct contact details may limit immediate customer engagement but is mitigated by a contact form.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive information in the HTML content. The use of modern JavaScript frameworks and absence of outdated libraries reduce vulnerability risks. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the site against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may impact transparency and preparedness perception. The WHOIS data absence raises concerns about domain registration transparency, although the website content and business presence suggest legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve defense against web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to increase transparency and user trust.
  3. Add verified company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to improve business credibility and user support.
  4. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data unavailability to enhance domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Meteopress s. r. o.
Description
Předpověď počasí a nejnovější síť meteoradarů. Počasí na dnešní den i 14 dní pro každé místo v ČR. Aktuální stav počasí, oblačnost, vítr.
Key services
Weather forecasts (current, hourly, 14-day), Meteoradar network, Weather-related articles and analysis, Webcams, Business weather services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
SvelteKit, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, JavaScript ES Modules, Video streaming (webm, mp4)
Frameworks
SvelteKit
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
  4. Strong social media presence and business branding.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact form present.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear GDPR compliant.
  7. Modern frontend technology stack with SvelteKit and ES modules.
  8. Good SEO and mobile optimization.
  9. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack based on SvelteKit with ES modules, enabling efficient client-side rendering and modular code loading. It integrates Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icons, and streams live webcam videos in webm and mp4 formats. The backend CMS is WordPress, inferred from REST API endpoints and wp-content URLs, indicating a hybrid architecture. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in accessibility and SEO enhancements. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. No hosting provider details were identified. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, reflecting a standard digital marketing setup. Overall, the technical infrastructure is contemporary and well-suited for the site's content and audience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with meteopress.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meteopress.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.