Skip to main content

Security report for metbabes.com

MetBabes.com · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MetBabes.com is an adult entertainment affiliate website providing free daily updated galleries of nude and erotic photography sourced from the well-known MetArt.com network. The site operates primarily as a free content provider with affiliate links to various adult content platforms, positioning itself within the niche adult media sector. The business appears small in scale, with a long domain history dating back to 2007, and is associated with Bravo Media Group. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and JavaScript with Google Analytics for tracking, hosted by URL Solutions, Inc. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows basic mobile and SEO optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or terms of service pages, though a cookie policy with consent is present. No direct contact information or incident response channels are provided, which limits transparency and user trust. Overall, the site is functional but could benefit from enhanced security, privacy, and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching metbabes.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets adult users interested in free erotic and nude photography, leveraging affiliate partnerships with multiple adult content providers to monetize traffic. Its market position is that of a niche content aggregator and affiliate, relying on long-standing domain age and established partner networks to maintain relevance. The business model is primarily advertising and affiliate-driven, with no direct sales or subscription services evident. The extensive network of partner sites indicates a broad affiliate ecosystem. Growth potential depends on maintaining traffic and compliance with evolving privacy regulations. The lack of direct contact or corporate transparency may impact credibility with users and partners.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic. The site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS. No visible vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided. The absence of privacy and terms of service pages suggests compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR and other data protection regulations. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces tracking but no clear data retention or privacy details are disclosed. The site should improve its security posture by implementing recommended headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear privacy and security policies to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC and add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to enhance transparency and facilitate security reporting.
  4. Review and limit third-party tracking scripts and disclose data collection and retention practices to align with privacy regulations.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MetBabes.com
Description
MetBabes site offers free daily updated galleries featuring beauty naked models from the world famous erotic website MetArt.com.
Key services
Free daily updated erotic photo galleries, Affiliate linking to adult content sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics (ga.js), Basic HTML/CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by external scripts loaded via https)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content affiliate site offering free erotic photo galleries.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the site.
  3. Cookie policy is present with a consent banner.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  5. Multiple external affiliate links to known adult content sites.
  6. Uses Google Analytics for tracking.
  7. No advanced security headers detected.
  8. No CMS or modern frameworks detected; basic HTML and JavaScript used.
  9. Content is clearly adult and NSFW.
  10. Domain is old and consistent with business age.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and JavaScript, using Google Analytics for visitor tracking. It lacks modern web frameworks or CMS platforms, indicating a simple and possibly legacy infrastructure. Hosting is provided by URL Solutions, Inc., a known registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization techniques detected. SEO is basic, relying on meta keywords and descriptions. Accessibility features are minimal. The site uses affiliate links extensively, which may introduce security and privacy risks if not properly managed. Technical debt is evident in the absence of modern security practices and lack of structured data or rich metadata. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS, improving security headers, and enhancing mobile responsiveness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with metbabes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review metbabes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.