Skip to main content

Security report for metatroncapital.eu

Metatron Capital · Finance · Slovakia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Metatron Capital is a Slovak-based financial services company specializing in fund and portfolio management. The company offers several investment funds with distinct strategies, including long-term equity, event-driven, and AI sector funds. It maintains strong partnerships with reputable brokers, banks, auditors, and regulators, ensuring transparency and compliance. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor, featuring modern web technologies and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Contact information is available via professional emails and social media, but no phone numbers or physical addresses were found in the provided content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching metatroncapital.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention metatroncapital.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for metatroncapital.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Metatron Capital positions itself as a professional asset management firm targeting investors seeking disciplined and transparent fund management. Its competitive advantage lies in experienced portfolio managers, regulatory compliance, and partnerships with established financial institutions. The business model focuses on managing multiple funds with clear investment mandates. The company demonstrates growth and stability through its partnerships and regulatory approvals. The website supports investor engagement with detailed fund descriptions and team bios, enhancing credibility and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy preferences. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers and documented security or incident response policies indicates room for improvement. The lack of a published privacy policy or terms of service is a compliance gap. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the website's purpose but could be enhanced to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and transparency.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information and security policy documentation.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding phone contact and physical address details to enhance trust and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Metatron Capital
Description
Metatron Capital is a financial services company specializing in fund management with a clear investment philosophy and disciplined investment process. They offer multiple funds including Metatron Long-Term Equity Fund, Metatron Event-Driven Fund, and Metatron AI Sector Fund. The company collaborates with brokers, banks, auditors, and administrators to ensure transparency and stability.
Key services
Fund management, Portfolio management, Investment advisory
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor 3.32.4, jQuery 3.7.1, CookieYes cookie consent, Owl Carousel, Swiper Carousel
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieYes
Marketing tools
Elementor, Owl Carousel, Swiper
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user preferences.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content.
  4. Contact emails are professional and domain-specific.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress and Elementor technologies.
  6. Strong trust indicators via partnerships and regulatory references.
  7. No visible security or privacy policy documentation.
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in provided content.
  9. Content is primarily in Slovak language with some English elements.
  10. Social media presence includes LinkedIn and Twitter.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, jQuery, and popular carousel libraries (Owl Carousel, Swiper). The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. The hosting registrar is WebSupport s.r.o., a known European provider. Cookie consent is managed by CookieYes, ensuring GDPR compliance. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, but security headers and SEO metadata could be enhanced for better performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with metatroncapital.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review metatroncapital.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.