Skip to main content

Security report for meraki.hu

Meraki Marketing Kft. · Media · Hungary

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Meraki Marketing Kft. is a Hungarian digital marketing agency specializing in services such as web development, SEO, videomarketing, branding, and digital campaigns. The company targets businesses aiming for growth and international market entry, positioning itself as an innovative and fast-growing agency with a strong client portfolio and testimonials. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and provides clear contact information and GDPR-compliant privacy policies. Technically, the site uses Joomla CMS with UIkit framework and integrates common marketing and analytics tools like Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. However, the website suffers from critical security issues due to an invalid or missing SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which undermines secure communications. Performance is also a concern with slow load times and large page size. Overall, the site demonstrates good privacy compliance and business credibility but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching meraki.hu

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
90
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Meraki Marketing operates in the media sector as a service provider offering a broad range of digital marketing solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive service portfolio, strong client references, and innovative approach to digital solutions including emerging platforms like TikTok. The business model is B2B service-oriented, focusing on brand differentiation and international expansion for clients. The company maintains an active online presence with social media integration and uses modern web technologies. The client base includes notable companies across various industries, indicating a well-established market position. Growth indicators include a diverse service offering and a professional, content-rich website. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which are critical for secure HTTPS communication. While HSTS is enabled with preload and includeSubDomains, the lack of proper SSL/TLS undermines this protection. No major vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, but the site lacks OCSP stapling and session resumption features, which could improve security and performance. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The presence of secure forms with reCAPTCHA is a positive aspect, but overall, the site requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues to meet basic security standards and GDPR requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user data transmission.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated versions to enhance security.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve certificate validation and performance.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan to increase transparency and trust.
  5. Optimize website performance by reducing page size and improving load times for better user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Meraki Marketing Kft.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with Yootheme Pro and UIkit framework, indicating a modern and modular architecture. It integrates Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA for analytics, marketing, and security. Hosting appears to be provided by Webpark based on DNS records. Despite a rich content structure and professional design, the site suffers from slow performance with a load time exceeding 12 seconds and a large page size (~745 KB). Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical debt and risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires urgent security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with meraki.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meraki.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.