Skip to main content

Security report for mentalhealthinvestment.org

Coalition for Mental Health Investment · Healthcare · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Coalition for Mental Health Investment is a non-profit organization focused on increasing global investment in mental health to meet the scale of need. Their mission includes connecting leaders across sectors, inspiring investment, and scaling evidence-based mental health solutions, particularly in low and middle-income countries. The website is professionally designed using Squarespace, featuring multimedia content such as videos and images that support their advocacy efforts. The technical infrastructure is modern and mobile-optimized, though some SEO and accessibility features could be enhanced. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, but additional security headers and explicit privacy policies are lacking. Contact information is minimal, with only a LinkedIn profile linked, which may limit direct engagement. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or query failure, which is common for non-profit organizations but slightly reduces transparency. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves its advocacy purpose well but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mentalhealthinvestment.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization occupies a niche position in the global mental health investment advocacy space, targeting investors, policymakers, and health professionals. Their business model is non-profit and advocacy-driven, relying on partnerships and connections rather than commercial revenue streams. The coalition emphasizes evidence-based approaches and aims to leverage financial, societal, and health outcomes to attract investment. Their partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed on the site, and no direct business contacts or certifications are displayed. The presence of a professional video and consistent branding supports credibility. Growth indicators and market positioning suggest a focused but small-scale operation primarily targeting global health stakeholders.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and HSTS headers, ensuring encrypted communication and protection against protocol downgrade attacks. However, the absence of additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content or scripts. The lack of a visible privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism indicates compliance gaps, especially relevant under GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response information and security contact channels are not provided, which could hinder timely reporting and resolution of security issues. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with better compliance and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident reporting channels to enhance trust and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve site discoverability and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Coalition for Mental Health Investment
Description
A coalition aiming to increase investment in mental health globally to match the scale of need. They focus on connecting leaders, inspiring investment, and scaling evidence-based mental health solutions, especially in low and middle-income countries.
Key services
Connecting leaders across sectors, Inspiring global investment in mental health, Scaling evidence-based mental health solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Fonts (Poppins), Plyr video player, Squarespace JavaScript libraries
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace with professional design and multimedia content.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers are provided on the homepage or header.
  4. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn only.
  5. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking; site content is fully accessible.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond Squarespace standard scripts.
  8. Content is focused on mental health investment advocacy and is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging its built-in CMS, hosting, and content delivery infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts for typography and the Plyr video player for multimedia content. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and smooth animations. Performance is moderate, typical for Squarespace sites, with no major loading issues detected. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO is supported by canonical tags and Open Graph metadata but lacks comprehensive meta descriptions and structured data beyond basic JSON-LD for website and local business. The technical stack is modern and stable but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mentalhealthinvestment.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mentalhealthinvestment.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.