Skip to main content

Security report for menessdiena.lv

SIA “Mēness diena” · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA “Mēness diena” is a Latvian travel operator and agency specializing in curated, leisurely travel experiences with a focus on quality and enjoyment. With over 20 years of experience, the company offers a variety of travel services including cruises, cultural event visits, skiing trips, and small group tours. The website reflects a well-established small business with clear contact information, legal registration, and active social media presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern frameworks like Bootstrap 4 and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for marketing and analytics. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though it lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain registration transparency, but the business information on the site appears consistent and trustworthy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching menessdiena.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention menessdiena.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for menessdiena.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche market segment in the Latvian travel industry, targeting discerning travelers seeking quality and thematic travel experiences. Its business model revolves around organizing and selling specialized tours and travel packages. The presence of a tourism operator license and clear company registration details enhances credibility. The website content and navigation are well-structured, supporting customer engagement and conversion. The company leverages social media channels like Instagram and Facebook to maintain customer relationships and promote offerings. Growth potential exists through expanding digital marketing and improving compliance with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure login forms. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement in protecting users and complying with GDPR. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The commented-out Facebook Pixel suggests cautious adoption of tracking technologies. Incident response and security policies are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve trust and readiness. Regular updates and security hardening are recommended to maintain and improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider enabling and properly configuring Facebook Pixel and other marketing tools with user privacy in mind.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “Mēness diena”
Registration number
40103739386
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “Mēness diena”
Description
Ceļojumu operators un aģentūra, kas piedāvā nesteidzīgus, baudpilnus ceļojumus kvalitatīvai atpūtai. Uzņēmuma pieredze tūrismā ir vairāk kā 20 gadu garumā, piedāvājot ceļojumus ar īpašu uzmanību uz kvalitāti un baudu.
Key services
Ceļojumu organizēšana, Kruīzi, Koncertu un kultūras pasākumu apmeklējumi, Slēpošanas tūres, Mazās grupas ceļojumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 4, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login form with POST method
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (commented out)
Marketing tools
Google Optimize
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Business information is clearly presented with contact details and legal data.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found; GDPR compliance could be improved.
  5. Security headers are not detected; opportunity to enhance security posture.
  6. Use of modern technologies and CMS (WordPress) with common plugins.
  7. Social media presence is active with links to Instagram, Facebook, and Draugiem.lv.
  8. Login form present for user authentication, uses POST method.
  9. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for analytics and marketing.
  10. Facebook Pixel is present but commented out, indicating possible future use.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap 4 for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates Google Analytics, Tag Manager, and Google Optimize for analytics and marketing optimization. The site loads a variety of CSS and JS assets from both internal and external sources, including FontAwesome for icons. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses a modal login form with secure POST submission. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with menessdiena.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review menessdiena.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.