Skip to main content

Security report for meka.lv

Bārs Meka · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bārs Meka is a small but capacious bar located in the heart of Zemgale, Latvia, offering a wide range of drinks, tasty meals, and a pleasant atmosphere. It caters primarily to local patrons, families with children (offering a playroom), and those seeking a venue for weekend parties. The website is built on WordPress and uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics, with Cloudflare providing DNS and CDN services. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with a good user experience and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and Cloudflare protection, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner and a linked privacy policy page. No direct contact information or incident response details are provided on the analyzed page. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy for a local hospitality business, with room for improvement in security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching meka.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a local hospitality venue focusing on bar services, food, and event hosting. Its market position is that of a small, community-focused bar with family-friendly amenities. Revenue streams likely include food and beverage sales and event hosting. The company maintains an active social media presence on Twitter and Facebook, enhancing customer engagement. The website's partnership with Grandem for development indicates a professional approach to digital presence. There is no evidence of complex partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are limited but the site content and updates suggest ongoing activity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Cloudflare is used for DNS and CDN, providing some protection against common threats. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Analytics and jQuery, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via cookie consent and privacy policy, but more comprehensive data protection measures and transparency could be implemented.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by providing detailed data retention policies and clearer GDPR-related disclosures.
  5. Improve accessibility features to broaden user inclusivity and comply with standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bārs Meka
Description
Neliels, bet ietilpīgs bārs pašā Zemgales sirdī ar plašu dzērienu klāstu, gardu maltīti un teicamu atmosfēru. Piedāvā bērnu rotaļu istabu, terasi un Wi-Fi. Lieliska ballīšu vieta brīvdienām.
Key services
dzērieni, ēdieni, bērnu rotaļu istaba, terase, Wi-Fi, ballīšu vieta
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Colorbox, WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cloudflare DNS and CDN usage

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based local bar site with good content and moderate technical implementation.
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the analyzed page.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR privacy policy is linked.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Social media presence on Twitter and Facebook is active.
  6. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policies found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a technology stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, and Colorbox for UI elements. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and alternate language links. However, accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses multiple CSS grid stylesheets and Google Fonts. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but security-related technical enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with meka.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meka.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.