Skip to main content

Security report for meinlieblingsevent.de

Mein LIEBLINGS Event GmbH · Hospitality · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mein LIEBLINGS Event GmbH operates a professional event promotion website focused on concerts and events in Germany. The company targets event attendees seeking memorable experiences and offers services including event organization and venue rental. The website demonstrates a consistent brand presence with active social media integration and sponsor visibility, positioning it as a regional player in the hospitality and media sectors. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as Livewire, Alpine.js, GSAP, and Swiper.js, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Hosting is provided by Schlund Technologies, a reputable German hosting provider. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with basic SEO and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page further indicates limited formal security governance. However, no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content provided. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching meinlieblingsevent.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
33
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention meinlieblingsevent.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for meinlieblingsevent.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the event promotion and hospitality industry, focusing on concerts and regional events in Germany. Its business model revolves around organizing and promoting events and offering venue rental services. The website showcases a curated list of artists and sponsors, suggesting established partnerships and a network within the entertainment sector. The target audience includes music fans and event attendees in the German market. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused regional presence. The lack of detailed corporate information such as founding year or parent company limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. The website uses HTTPS (implied by external script sources), but no explicit security headers like Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The use of modern frameworks is positive, but the absence of formal security documentation and headers suggests room for improvement. No immediate vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found, but the site should implement security best practices to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Configure and deploy security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create a security.txt file or a vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance contact information by adding phone numbers and physical address to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mein LIEBLINGS Event GmbH
Description
Entdecke unserer kommenden Veranstaltungen – perfekt für jeden, der einzigartige Momente sucht. Sei dabei und erlebe Events, die begeistern und lange in Erinnerung bleiben!
Key services
Event organization, Event promotion, Venue rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Livewire, Alpine.js, GSAP, Swiper.js, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Laravel Livewire
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with good event promotion content.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information limited to email only; no phone or physical address found.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active and linked.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools indicates moderate digital maturity.
  6. No visible security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  8. Sponsors and artists are prominently displayed, enhancing trust.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Laravel Livewire with Alpine.js for interactivity, GSAP for animations, and Swiper.js for carousels. It uses Plausible Analytics for privacy-friendly user tracking. Hosting is via Schlund Technologies, a German hosting provider. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently with preload hints. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and adaptive images. SEO metadata is present but minimal, with some Open Graph tags empty. No CMS is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in accessibility and SEO. No forms were detected in the provided HTML, indicating limited data collection points.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with meinlieblingsevent.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meinlieblingsevent.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.