The Deutscher Datenschutzrat Online-Werbung (DDOW) operates as a voluntary self-regulatory organization focused on online behavioral advertising (OBA) in Germany. It aims to harmonize consumer interests and digital advertising industry standards by providing transparency, consumer control mechanisms, and a complaint process. The website serves as an information hub for consumers and businesses regarding data protection in online advertising. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using a child theme of Twenty Twenty-One, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though it lacks explicit security policies and incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-branded, serving a niche regulatory function in the German digital advertising market.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
62
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention meine-cookies.org, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for meine-cookies.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
DDOW holds a key position as a self-regulatory body in the German online advertising sector, supported by multiple industry associations and organized within the ZAW. Its business model centers on voluntary compliance and consumer protection rather than commercial services. The organization targets both consumers concerned about data privacy and companies seeking to comply with OBA standards. The website reflects a small but focused operation with clear governance and complaint handling processes. Partnerships with industry bodies enhance its legitimacy. The lack of direct contact details and limited digital marketing tools suggest a conservative digital presence aligned with its regulatory role.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks advanced security headers and published security policies, which are recommended best practices. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Incident response mechanisms are not publicly detailed. Overall, the site is secure for visitors but could improve in formalizing and communicating its security governance and response capabilities.
Recommendations
Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response information on the website.
Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
Provide direct contact emails or phone numbers for consumer and security inquiries to improve trust.
Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Deutscher Datenschutzrat Online-Werbung
Description
Der Deutsche Datenschutzrat Online-Werbung (DDOW) ist die freiwillige Selbstkontrolleinrichtung der digitalen Werbewirtschaft für nutzungsbasierte Online-Werbung in Deutschland. Er bietet Transparenz und Selbstbestimmung für Verbraucher im Bereich Online Behavioral Advertising (OBA).
Key services
Selbstregulierung im Bereich Online Behavioral Advertising, Bereitstellung von Kodizes und Standards, Beschwerdeverfahren für Verbraucher, Informationsbereitstellung und Beratung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript
Frameworks
Twenty Twenty-One WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Use of contact form plugin with validation
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
Content is in German and focused on online advertising data protection self-regulation.
No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners found despite GDPR relevance.
Contact is primarily via contact forms; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
No social media links detected.
Website uses WordPress CMS with a child theme based on Twenty Twenty-One.
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
WHOIS data is minimal but domain appears stable and legitimate.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a standard WordPress CMS platform with a custom child theme derived from Twenty Twenty-One. It uses modern JavaScript and CSS with responsive design features ensuring good mobile usability. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags beyond basics and does not appear to use analytics or tracking services. No CDN or hosting provider details are evident. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with meine-cookies.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meine-cookies.org.