Skip to main content

Security report for megeve.com

Megève Tourisme · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Megève Tourisme operates a comprehensive and professionally designed tourism website promoting the alpine resort of Megève in France. The site targets tourists interested in skiing, outdoor activities, gastronomy, and cultural experiences. It serves as an official or semi-official portal with extensive content, event calendars, and accommodation booking links. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics tools, ensuring good SEO, accessibility, and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers, though no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. WHOIS data is privacy-protected but the domain is active and well-maintained, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is a trustworthy and valuable resource for visitors planning a stay in Megève.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching megeve.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a key regional tourism portal, leveraging partnerships such as the booking platform megeve-booking.com. Its business model focuses on information dissemination and visitor engagement rather than direct sales. The target audience includes international tourists, as evidenced by multilingual support and extensive activity guides. The site demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust signals, including privacy compliance and structured data. Growth potential lies in expanding digital services and enhancing direct booking capabilities. The partnership ecosystem includes analytics providers and local tourism stakeholders.

Security posture

The site exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and integration of monitoring tools like Sentry. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. GDPR compliance is indicated by privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. The site would benefit from publishing explicit security and incident response information to enhance transparency and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Add an incident response contact email (e.g., security@ or abuse@) to facilitate reporting.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility to improve business credibility and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Megève Tourisme
Description
Megève is a 4-season alpine ski resort located in Haute-Savoie, France, offering alpine charm and happiness. The website promotes tourism activities, accommodations, skiing, gastronomy, and local culture.
Key services
Tourism information, Accommodation booking, Activity guides, Event calendar, Visitor information
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Matomo Analytics, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, MapLibre, Iris Interactive plugins
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring (Sentry integration)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Hotjar, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is rich, professionally presented, and well-structured.
  3. Strong SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet; likely on contact page.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection.
  7. Use of multiple analytics and tracking tools with moderate user tracking.
  8. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Matomo Analytics, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager. It uses custom Iris Interactive plugins for enhanced functionality and MapLibre for mapping features. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and multiple third-party scripts. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Opportunities exist to optimize loading speed and further modernize the tech stack for scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with megeve.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review megeve.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.