Skip to main content

Security report for meetac.com

Visit Atlantic City · Hospitality · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Visit Atlantic City operates as the official destination marketing organization for Atlantic City, providing comprehensive tourism information, event calendars, group travel support, and promotional services. The website targets tourists, event planners, and group travelers, offering a broad range of services to enhance visitor experience and promote Atlantic City as a travel destination. The business model centers on tourism promotion and visitor engagement, positioning itself as a key player in the hospitality sector within the United States. Technically, the website is built on the Simpleview CMS platform, utilizing a modern technology stack including jQuery, RequireJS, Google Tag Manager, and various analytics and marketing tools. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although performance is moderate. The infrastructure supports extensive user tracking and marketing efforts, indicating a mature digital presence. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs several best practices such as asynchronous script loading and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended for enhanced protection. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as WHOIS registration data, presents compliance and legitimacy concerns that should be addressed. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in appearance but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security header implementation. The missing WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that could impact trustworthiness assessments. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and clarifying domain registration details to strengthen business credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching meetac.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention meetac.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for meetac.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Visit Atlantic City holds a strong market position as the official tourism promotion entity for Atlantic City, leveraging partnerships with local sports organizations and lodging booking platforms. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive visitor resources, event promotion, and group travel services. Revenue streams likely include tourism marketing funds, partnerships, and promotional campaigns. The target customer segments include leisure tourists, business event planners, and group travel coordinators. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and integration of booking services. The partnership ecosystem includes sports organizations and lodging platforms, enhancing service offerings and market reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools. Key vulnerabilities include the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could expose the site to clickjacking and content injection risks. Compliance gaps are evident due to missing privacy and cookie policies, potentially impacting GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting readiness for security events. The security culture appears focused on basic protections but lacks comprehensive transparency and advanced controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR and global privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Clarify domain WHOIS registration details and ensure transparency to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies with clear contact channels.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Visit Atlantic City
Description
From concerts to casinos, festivals to fine dining—discover nonstop fun and iconic attractions in Atlantic City all year round.
Key services
Visitor guides, Event calendars, Group travel itineraries, Meetings and conventions support, Film location services, Promotions and deals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, RequireJS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Bing Ads, Clarity Microsoft, Mouseflow, Vimeo Player API, Plyr video player, Glide.js slider, FontAwesome, Simpleview platform
Platforms
Simpleview CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for scripts
  • No inline scripts detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google DoubleClick, AppNexus (adnxs.com)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, LinkedIn Insight Tag, TVSquared
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found in the HTML content
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible content
  4. Strong use of third-party analytics and marketing tools
  5. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  6. No explicit data protection officer or incident response information found
  7. Social media presence is strong and consistent with brand
  8. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature technology stack centered around the Simpleview CMS platform, integrating multiple third-party analytics and marketing services. The use of RequireJS and asynchronous script loading supports modular and efficient resource management. Performance is moderate, with good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed through meta tags and structured navigation. However, there is room for improvement in security header implementation and potential optimization of third-party script loading to enhance speed and reduce tracking footprint. Technical debt appears low, but ongoing maintenance of external dependencies is critical.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with meetac.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meetac.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.