Skip to main content

Security report for medoncr.com

Medon Clinical Research · Healthcare · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Medon Clinical Research is a modern private medical clinic and clinical research center located in Warsaw, Poland, specializing in diagnostics and therapy across multiple medical fields including gynecology, urology, gastroenterology, cardiology, oncology, and child psychiatry. The website presents a professional image with clear service descriptions and targets patients seeking private healthcare services in the Mokotów district of Warsaw. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, with SEO optimization via Rank Math and tracking through Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks some security headers and explicit privacy or security policies. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and reduces overall trust. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, publishing privacy and terms policies, and clarifying domain registration status.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching medoncr.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention medoncr.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for medoncr.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate medoncr.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
7
Registered
7
Resolving
7
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-20

Masked preview

  • me••••.comMediumomission
  • me•••••.comLowreplacement
  • me•••.cr.comLowsubdomain

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of medoncr.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Medon Clinical Research operates in the healthcare sector as a small private clinic offering specialized medical diagnostics and clinical research services. Its market position is that of a modern, patient-focused clinic in Warsaw's Mokotów district. The business model revolves around direct patient services and clinical trials. The website indicates a focus on quality care with experienced specialists and personalized patient approach. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that may affect business credibility. The company uses common digital marketing and analytics tools but lacks visible partnerships or certifications on the site. Growth potential is tied to the healthcare demand in Warsaw and clinical research opportunities.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses reputable third-party services for analytics and cookie consent, indicating baseline security awareness. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No forms were detected in the provided content, so input validation and anti-CSRF protections could not be assessed. The missing WHOIS registration data is a significant risk factor, as it may indicate domain registration issues or privacy concerns. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, which limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with better header configurations, policy disclosures, and domain legitimacy verification.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and ensure secure form handling with anti-CSRF tokens.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Medon Clinical Research
Description
Medon Clinical Research to nowoczesna przychodnia i ośrodek badań klinicznych w Warszawie. Specjalizujemy się w diagnostyce i terapii z zakresu m.in. ginekologii, urologii, gastroenterologii, kardiologii, onkologii i psychiatrii dziecięcej.
Key services
diagnostics, consultations, clinical research, gynecology, urology, gastroenterology, cardiology, oncology, child psychiatry
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Astra Theme, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, CookieYes
Frameworks
Rank Math SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WHOIS registration data found, domain may be unregistered or WHOIS server returned no match
  3. Professional healthcare service provider in Warsaw, Poland
  4. Uses modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins and SEO tools
  5. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  6. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  8. No forms detected in provided HTML snippet
  9. No social media links explicitly found in HTML content
  10. SSL/TLS is enabled and appears properly configured
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, leveraging modern web technologies and SEO tools like Rank Math. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine visibility. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected in the provided content. However, the absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical and operational risks. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small healthcare provider but requires improvements in security and domain management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with medoncr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review medoncr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.