Skip to main content

Security report for mediterra.cz

Group Mediterra a.s. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Group Mediterra a.s. is a Czech healthcare group operating multiple hospitals, clinics, and a medical secondary school, providing comprehensive healthcare services including preventive, acute, and follow-up care. The group serves both domestic patients under public health insurance and international patients seeking specialized medical procedures. The website is professionally designed using WordPress CMS with modern technologies and offers multilingual support. It implements GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain transparency but the website content and business information appear legitimate and trustworthy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mediterra.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mediterra.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11
Employees
1
Customers
8
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
18%

Latest record dated 2025-04-14 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mediterra.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mail.mediterra.cz2025-04-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a medium-sized healthcare provider in the Czech Republic with a diversified portfolio of healthcare facilities and educational services. Its business model focuses on delivering a full lifecycle of healthcare services and attracting international patients for specialized treatments. The group maintains partnerships with related healthcare and compliance platforms. The website content and social media presence support a professional and trustworthy brand image. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not significantly impact the business credibility given the detailed service offerings and contact information.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is implemented in compliance with GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to enforce HTTPS usage and prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Group Mediterra a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Group Mediterra a.s.
Description
Group Mediterra a.s. operates six healthcare facilities and a medical secondary school in the Czech Republic, providing a full lifecycle of healthcare services including preventive, acute, and follow-up care. The group serves both Czech public health insurance patients and international patients for specialized procedures.
Key services
Preventive care, Acute care, Follow-up care, Intensive and long-term nursing care, Home care, Medical education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Circle Progress JS, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Fonts (Figtree), WordPress 6.8.3
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language with multilingual support (English, German).
  3. Strong focus on healthcare services and education.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is a concern for domain transparency.
  7. Multiple social media channels are actively linked.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.8.3, utilizing popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Magnific Popup for UI components. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility considerations, though these could be enhanced. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from additional security hardening and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mediterra.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mediterra.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.