Skip to main content

Security report for mediq.nl

Mediq · Healthcare · Netherlands

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mediq is a well-established Dutch healthcare company specializing in the distribution of medical aids and supplies, including products for incontinence, diabetes, respiratory care, stoma, wound care, medical nutrition, and infusion therapy. Founded in 2005, the company operates a professional e-commerce platform targeting healthcare providers and patients in the Netherlands. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a focus on user experience and compliance with privacy regulations. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Sitecore SXA, Bootstrap, and integrates analytics and monitoring tools like Google Analytics, Datadog RUM, and Hotjar. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though improvements can be made by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating stable operations. Overall, Mediq demonstrates a strong market position in healthcare supplies with a trustworthy and compliant online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mediq.nl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mediq.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
519
Employees
0
Customers
519
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
4%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mediq.nl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mediq holds a significant position in the Dutch healthcare market, providing a comprehensive range of medical supplies through an e-commerce model. The company targets healthcare professionals and patients requiring medical aids, emphasizing convenience and speed of delivery. Their business model is supported by a robust digital infrastructure and partnerships with analytics and marketing platforms. The absence of visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a focus on digital self-service, while social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn supports brand engagement. The company’s longevity since 2005 and consistent domain registration reinforce credibility. Strategic opportunities include expanding direct contact channels and enhancing security transparency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, reflecting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent areas for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with recommendations to strengthen DNS security and formalize incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall DNS security.
  2. Implement and publish security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide visible contact channels to improve user trust and support.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mediq
Description
Compleet assortiment hulpmiddelen voor incontinentie, diabetes, luchtweg, stoma, wondzorg, medische voeding en infuustherapie. Eenvoudig bestellen, snel in huis.
Key services
Medical aids for incontinence, Diabetes care products, Respiratory care, Stoma care, Wound care, Medical nutrition, Infusion therapy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, jQuery UI, Font Awesome, MediaElement.js, FullCalendar, Datadog RUM, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Sitecore Experience Accelerator (SXA)
Platforms
Web (desktop and mobile)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Datadog RUM, Hotjar, Convert Insight, Quantcast
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Quantcast
Tracking pixels
Datadog RUM, Hotjar, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed cookie categories and providers.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage; only physical address found in structured data.
  4. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  5. Strong privacy compliance with GDPR indicated by cookie consent and privacy policy.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Sitecore Experience Accelerator platform, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery UI for interactive components. It integrates multiple analytics and monitoring tools such as Google Analytics, Datadog RUM, Hotjar, and Convert Insight, indicating a data-driven approach to user experience optimization. The site loads multiple CSS stylesheets and scripts asynchronously to improve performance. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards are properly configured. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were observed. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mediq.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mediq.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.