Skip to main content

Security report for medin.cz

MEDIN, a.s. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MEDIN, a.s. is a Czech-based manufacturer specializing in medical instruments and implants, serving the healthcare sector with products for traumatology, surgery, orthopedics, and stomatology. The company supports its products with educational services, workshops, and instrument servicing, positioning itself as a trusted partner in the medical device industry with international reach. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting medical professionals and healthcare providers. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google reCAPTCHA for form security and lazy loading for images, though some image loading errors were noted. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks some recommended security headers. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust verification, but the website content and structure support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-designed, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching medin.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MEDIN operates in the healthcare manufacturing sector with a medium-sized business profile. Its business model combines product manufacturing with value-added services such as training and instrument maintenance. The company has a strong market position in the Czech Republic and exports globally. The website indicates a focus on professional medical audiences and emphasizes quality and innovation. Partnerships include an official e-commerce platform and a web development firm. The company leverages testimonials and client references to build trust. Absence of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from perceived credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA protecting user input forms. Cookie consent is actively managed, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security score. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found. The site should improve header implementation and fix broken image links to enhance security and user trust. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Fix broken lazyload image links to improve user experience and trust.
  3. Obtain and publish WHOIS data or ensure domain registration transparency to improve legitimacy.
  4. Consider adding a terms of service page and explicit incident response contact information.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for security vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MEDIN, a.s.
Description
MEDIN, a.s. is a manufacturer of medical instruments and implants, offering products for traumatology, surgery, orthopedics, and stomatology. They provide services including education, workshops, instrument servicing, and additional manufacturing processes.
Key services
Manufacture of medical instruments and implants, Education and training for doctors and nurses, Servicing of surgical instruments, Custom manufacturing services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google reCAPTCHA, RoyalSlider, Webshim polyfill, Vanilla LazyLoad, Google Fonts (Roboto)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with settings

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA for security.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed settings.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and email.
  6. Content is professional, relevant to healthcare manufacturing.
  7. Some images fail to load due to lazyload errors.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No terms of service page found.
  10. Social media presence includes Facebook only.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mix of modern front-end technologies such as Google Fonts, RoyalSlider for image sliders, and Vanilla LazyLoad for performance optimization. Google reCAPTCHA is integrated for form security. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO optimization. Some technical debt is evident in broken image lazy loading and missing security headers. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. Performance is moderate, with opportunities for improvement in accessibility and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with medin.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review medin.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.