Skip to main content

Security report for medimax.de

MEDIMAX · Retail · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MEDIMAX operates as a large-scale retail and e-commerce platform specializing in consumer electronics, household appliances, and entertainment electronics primarily targeting the German market. The website demonstrates a professional and comprehensive digital presence with extensive product categories and a user-friendly interface. The business is well-positioned in the retail sector with a strong focus on online shopping convenience and local store integration. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, and various third-party marketing and analytics tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, CSRF protection, and a detailed cookie consent mechanism, although explicit security headers could be enhanced. Privacy compliance is strong, with GDPR-aligned policies and consent management. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and suitable for general consumers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching medimax.de

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MEDIMAX's market positioning as a prominent electronics retailer in Germany is supported by its extensive product catalog and integration with trusted third-party services such as Trusted Shops and idealo. The business model combines online sales with physical store presence, leveraging local store finders and pickup options. The company benefits from partnerships with recognized brands and marketing platforms, enhancing its competitive advantage. The website's content and navigation cater to a broad consumer base, indicating a focus on mass-market retail. While no direct financial or founding data is available, the site's scale and content quality suggest a large enterprise with established operations.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, CSRF token implementation, and a comprehensive cookie consent framework. Integration with Google Tag Manager and analytics is managed with user consent, aligning with privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options in the provided HTML is a minor gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the site maintains good security hygiene suitable for an e-commerce platform but could improve in formalizing security communications.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MEDIMAX
Description
wir bieten Ihnen eine große Auswahl an Elektronik, Haushaltsgeräten und Unterhaltungselektronik. Jetzt online shoppen und tolle Angebote sichern!
Key services
Online retail of electronics, Household appliances, Entertainment electronics, Store finder and local pickup
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery UI Autocomplete, Swiper Carousel, Loadbee, Flixmedia, Trusted Shops, Zoovu, Yourhomie Chatbot
Frameworks
EpResponsive (custom theme/framework)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in scripts
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook
Tracking pixels
Google Remarketing, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Trusted Shops, Channelsight, Pricespider
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented
  2. Multiple third-party integrations for marketing and analytics
  3. Clear navigation with extensive product categories
  4. No direct email or phone contact found in provided HTML snippet
  5. No explicit security or incident response policy found
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom responsive framework (EpResponsive) with modern JavaScript libraries including Swiper for carousels and jQuery UI for autocomplete functionality. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are employed for tracking and analytics, with user consent mechanisms in place. The site loads multiple third-party scripts for marketing, reviews, and chatbot services, indicating a complex but well-integrated tech stack. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization especially in loading times and accessibility. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears to be a proprietary or custom solution. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD for search actions. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with medimax.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review medimax.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.