Skip to main content

Security report for medijump.com

Medijump · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Medijump operates as a global medical tourism marketplace, connecting patients with vetted clinics and hospitals worldwide. The platform offers detailed procedure listings, pricing, and personalized enquiry services, positioning itself as a specialized player in the healthcare tourism sector. The website demonstrates a professional design with good content quality and user experience, supported by recognized medical accreditations that enhance trust. Technically, the site uses modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Bootstrap, with HTTPS enabled and basic security measures like CSRF tokens in place. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly found, indicating potential compliance gaps. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy from a user perspective but requires improvements in transparency and privacy compliance to strengthen its security posture and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching medijump.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention medijump.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for medijump.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Medijump targets patients seeking affordable and reliable medical treatments abroad, leveraging a marketplace model that aggregates clinics and hospitals globally. Its competitive advantage lies in clinic vetting, price matching, and comprehensive procedure information. The platform likely generates revenue through lead generation or referral fees from medical providers. The presence of multiple international accreditations suggests strong partnerships and a focus on quality assurance. The business appears medium-sized with a global reach but lacks publicly available corporate registration details. Growth potential exists in expanding clinic partnerships and enhancing user trust through improved transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The website maintains a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and CSRF protection on forms. However, the lack of security headers and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The missing WHOIS data and lack of privacy/cookie policies present compliance and trust challenges. Implementing security best practices such as Content-Security-Policy headers, explicit privacy notices, and a vulnerability disclosure program would enhance the security maturity and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Establish and publicize a security policy and incident response contact channels to improve trust and readiness.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Medijump
Description
Medijump is a global medical tourism marketplace connecting patients with clinics and hospitals worldwide. It offers a platform to find and book overseas medical treatments, providing accurate information, vetted clinics, and price matching services.
Key services
Clinic and hospital listings, Medical procedure search, Personalized quotes and enquiries, Price matching, Clinic vetting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Bootstrap, Typeahead.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF tokens present in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional medical tourism marketplace with global clinic listings.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, raising legitimacy concerns.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens in forms, indicating basic security hygiene.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Multiple recognized medical accreditations displayed for clinics, enhancing trust.
  7. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel used for analytics and tracking.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No signs of adult or NSFW content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Font Awesome for icons, and Typeahead.js for enhanced search functionality. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site uses CSRF tokens indicating secure form handling. Technical debt appears low, but adding accessibility improvements and security headers would strengthen the infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with medijump.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review medijump.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.