Skip to main content

Security report for medicover.com

Medicover · Healthcare · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Security headers.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Medicover is a large healthcare provider specializing in diagnostic and healthcare services primarily in Central and Eastern Europe, with recent expansion into India. The company operates through two main divisions, Diagnostic Services and Healthcare Services, targeting patients and healthcare consumers in these regions. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive corporate governance and financial information, indicating a mature business presence. Technically, the website is built on Drupal CMS with Bootstrap framework and integrates modern analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. It is mobile optimized and includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information published. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses privacy-compliant analytics configurations. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which requires further investigation. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. Overall, the website demonstrates a good security posture but could improve transparency and security best practices. The overall risk is moderate due to the missing WHOIS data and lack of explicit security policies. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and verifying domain registration details to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching medicover.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Medicover holds a strong market position as a healthcare services provider in Central and Eastern Europe with expansion into India. Its business model focuses on delivering diagnostic and healthcare services through specialized divisions. The company targets patients and healthcare consumers seeking quality healthcare solutions. The presence of detailed financial reports, corporate governance information, and an active media section suggests transparency and investor engagement. The company leverages partnerships with digital service providers for website delivery and analytics. Growth indicators include recent acquisitions and expansion into new markets. The website content and structure reflect a mature organization with a focus on sustainability and corporate responsibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, privacy-compliant analytics, and a cookie consent mechanism. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No visible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting external security engagement. The absence of published incident response contacts or security policies indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and improving communication channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and build trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Medicover
Description
Medicover is a specialised provider of diagnostic and healthcare services, focusing on markets mainly in Central and Eastern Europe and has recently entered India. The company operates through two divisions – Diagnostic Services and Healthcare Services.
Key services
Diagnostic Services, Healthcare Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Drupal CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Consentmanager CMP
Frameworks
Drupal, Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Consentmanager CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, which is unusual for a professional healthcare company.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant with consent mechanism.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content.
  5. Website uses modern technologies and is mobile optimized.
  6. Security headers are not explicitly detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  8. Social media links to Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter are present.
  9. Financial and corporate governance information is prominently available.
  10. Branding and content quality are good and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a Drupal CMS platform using Bootstrap 3.3.7 for responsive design. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and analytics, with IP anonymization enabled to support privacy compliance. The site uses a consent management platform to handle cookie consent in line with GDPR requirements. Performance is moderate with standard modern web technologies. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features such as skip links. However, the absence of explicit security headers and limited visible security policies indicate technical debt in security hardening. Hosting provider details are not directly discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional healthcare website but could benefit from modernization in security and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with medicover.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review medicover.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.