Skip to main content

Security report for mediconturavi.es

MEDICONTUR AVI · Healthcare · Spain

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MEDICONTUR AVI is a Spanish healthcare company specializing in ophthalmology products and services, aiming to improve quality and satisfaction for patients and professionals. The website reflects a small-sized, professional organization with a clear focus on healthcare and medical product distribution. Their market position is supported by active participation in industry events and collaborations. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, using modern plugins and Google reCAPTCHA for security. The site enforces HTTPS and has a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, indicating good privacy practices. Security posture is solid with room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query restrictions, limiting full domain trust verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mediconturavi.es

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare sector, targeting ophthalmology professionals and patients. Their business model includes product distribution and professional services, supported by partnerships with brands and participation in relevant congresses. The website content and social media presence indicate a growth-oriented and collaborative approach. Revenue streams likely derive from product sales and service contracts. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides comprehensive contact information, enhancing credibility. The lack of WHOIS data limits external verification but internal indicators suggest a legitimate and established business.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. Cookie consent is managed via a reputable GDPR plugin, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, and security headers are not detected, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis. The absence of a security.txt file and incident response contacts suggests limited transparency in vulnerability handling. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MEDICONTUR AVI
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MEDICONTUR AVI
Description
MEDICONTUR AVI, una nueva generación de profesionales, unidos con un solo objetivo mejorar la calidad y satisfacción de las personas
Key services
Ophthalmic products distribution, Professional healthcare services, Event participation and industry collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Slider Revolution, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced via script redirect
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent management via Complianz GDPR plugin

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to healthcare and ophthalmology.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with visible consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query restrictions from Red.es WHOIS service.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. Use of modern WordPress plugins and Google reCAPTCHA enhances security posture.
  8. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
  9. Website uses HTTPS with forced redirect ensuring secure connections.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses popular plugins including Slider Revolution for sliders, Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, and Complianz GDPR for cookie consent management. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking. The site enforces HTTPS with a client-side redirect script. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is modern and widely supported, though security headers are missing. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and functional website with opportunities for security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mediconturavi.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mediconturavi.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.