Skip to main content

Security report for mediapaper.se

Webbpartner AB · Media · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MediaPaper is a Swedish company specializing in converting traditional print materials such as PDFs into interactive digital publications. Their platform offers an easy-to-use SaaS solution that enables users to quickly digitize and distribute content optimized for multiple devices. The company targets businesses and individuals seeking to enhance their print materials with interactive features like clickable links and embedded videos. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information, reflecting a credible and customer-focused business. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates third-party marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Leadfeeder. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism and a cookie policy page, but no explicit privacy or security policies are found. WHOIS data for the exact domain is unavailable, suggesting the domain may be a subdomain or registered differently, which slightly impacts trust but does not detract from the overall legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and privacy policies, and improving accessibility features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mediapaper.se

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MediaPaper operates in the media sector with a niche focus on digital publishing solutions in Sweden. Their business model revolves around SaaS offerings that convert PDFs into interactive web publications, enabling clients to reach wider audiences with enhanced content. The company leverages partnerships, such as with Webbpartner AB, for website development. Their marketing ecosystem includes Google Analytics and Leadfeeder for user insights. The presence of customer examples and professional branding supports a positive market position. However, the lack of detailed WHOIS data and absence of terms of service or security policies suggest areas for operational maturity improvement. The company appears small-sized with a focused service offering and a clear target audience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and forms are protected using ASP.NET mechanisms. The presence of a cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response plan or contact channel for security issues to build trust.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Webbpartner AB
Registration number
556755-4984
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Webbpartner AB
Description
Omvandla dina trycksaker till interaktiva publikationer – snabbt, enkelt och med rätt känsla. Med ett fåtal klick omvandlas dina PDF:er till interaktiva publikationer.
Key services
PDF to interactive publication conversion, Online publication hosting, Automatic link recreation, Video integration, Brand customization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery 3.6.3, Font Awesome, Animate.css, Google Fonts, ImBox widget, lftracker (Leadfeeder), fancybox
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Platforms
Windows Server (implied by ASP.NET WebForms)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure forms with ASP.NET viewstate
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Leadfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leadfeeder
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (via gtag.js), Leadfeeder
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Swedish with clear business focus.
  3. Contact information is complete and includes phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented and functional.
  5. No explicit privacy policy page found but cookie policy page exists with GDPR compliance indications.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools is evident.
  8. No critical security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data detected.
  9. WHOIS data for the exact domain is missing, indicating possible subdomain usage or domain registration under a different name.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature ASP.NET WebForms platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery 3.6.3, Font Awesome, and Animate.css for UI enhancements. It integrates third-party widgets and tracking tools such as ImBox and Leadfeeder, and uses Google Analytics for visitor insights. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes a cookie consent mechanism. Performance is moderate, with some opportunities for optimization. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom or semi-custom solution. Hosting details are not explicit but likely on Windows-based infrastructure due to ASP.NET usage. Technical risks include reliance on multiple external scripts and lack of some security headers. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mediapaper.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mediapaper.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.