Skip to main content

Security report for mediain.sk

Media In · Media · Slovakia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Media In is a Slovak PR and marketing agency with over 23 years of experience, offering a wide range of services including media relations, media lobbying, event marketing, and digital communication. The company is positioned as a trusted partner in the media sector, with a strong local presence and membership in the international Cohn & Wolfe PR network. Their website reflects a professional business model targeting organizations seeking integrated PR and marketing consultancy. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and uses common analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. While the site is accessible and well-structured, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, and some security best practices like security headers are missing. The SSL configuration is good, but some external resources are loaded over HTTP, which could pose mixed content risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate, with room for improvement in compliance and security hardening. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. The site content is safe for general audiences and professionally presented.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mediain.sk

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Media In operates in the media sector, focusing on PR and marketing services for B2B and B2C clients. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing market presence since 1993 and their affiliation with the global Cohn & Wolfe network, which enhances their credibility and reach. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue through consultancy, media relations, event planning, and digital marketing services. The target customers are businesses and organizations requiring professional PR support. The partnership ecosystem includes international PR networks and local business partners. Growth indicators include a diverse service portfolio and a stable client base. The website content and structure support their market positioning, though the absence of privacy and security policies may affect trust with privacy-conscious clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of some HTTP resources introduces mixed content risks. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which are important for compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations. The presence of third-party tracking scripts without explicit consent mechanisms indicates potential privacy compliance gaps. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with opportunities to enhance defenses and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Ensure all external resources are loaded over HTTPS to eliminate mixed content warnings.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file.
  5. Review and update third-party scripts regularly and implement explicit user consent mechanisms for tracking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Media In
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Media In
Description
PR agentúra Media in ponúka služby: media lobing, media relations, monitoring médií, mediálny tréning, uvádzanie značky a produktu na trh, event marketing.
Key services
Uvedenie značky/produktu na trh, Návrh komunikačnej stratégie – B2B, B2C, Nákup médií, Grafické a kreatívne práce, Digitálna komunikácia, Prieskumy trhu, Media Relations, Media lobing, Mediálny tréning, Monitoring médií
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Maps API, FlexSlider, Yoast WordPress SEO plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel with asynchronous loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Ads Remarketing
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional PR and marketing agency site with clear business focus.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Use of multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts without explicit user consent mechanisms.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including emails, phone numbers, and physical address.
  5. No security headers detected; some external resources loaded over HTTP which may cause mixed content warnings.
  6. No evidence of security incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies.
  7. Good SEO practices with Yoast plugin and Open Graph metadata present.
  8. Website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and common JS libraries.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap framework and common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing tracking. The site uses the Yoast SEO plugin, indicating attention to SEO best practices. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts, but some resources are loaded over HTTP, which could impact security and user experience. Mobile optimization is basic but present. Accessibility features are minimal but the site structure is clear. There is no evidence of advanced modern frameworks or progressive web app features. Technical debt is moderate, with opportunities to modernize resource loading and enhance security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mediain.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mediain.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.