Skip to main content

Security report for mediaform.cz

mediaform, s.r.o. · Media · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

mediaform, s.r.o. is a boutique marketing, UX, and design studio based in Prague, Czech Republic, founded in 2011. The company specializes in creating technologically advanced and aesthetically pleasing digital applications and presentations, focusing on effective user experience and attention to detail. Their client portfolio includes notable brands such as L'Oréal, Marks & Spencer, and the Ministry of Interior of the Czech Republic, indicating a strong market position within the media and marketing sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting businesses seeking specialized marketing and design services. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Hosting is provided by VAS Hosting, with domain registration dating back to 2011, consistent with the company's founding year. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks important security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mediaform.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mediaform.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mediaform.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

mediaform operates as a small-sized boutique agency in the media sector, focusing on marketing, UX, and design services. Their business model revolves around delivering custom digital solutions and presentations to corporate clients. The presence of high-profile clients suggests competitive advantages in quality and specialization. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and retainers. The target customer segment includes medium to large enterprises requiring sophisticated marketing and UX design. The company maintains a consistent branding strategy and leverages partnerships with recognized brands, enhancing its market credibility. There is no indication of parent or subsidiary companies. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website and active social media presence. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved privacy compliance and security transparency to align with evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party tracking scripts like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel without visible consent mechanisms raises privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. There is no evidence of a dedicated security policy or data protection officer contact. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are apparent, the site would benefit from implementing security best practices and formalizing privacy and incident response policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to improve transparency and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
mediaform, s.r.o.
Registration number
29413907
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
mediaform, s.r.o.
Description
Technologicky o krok napřed. Vytváříme a dokonalé aplikace a prezentace pro vaší komunikaci, které jsou současně krásné. Efektivní UX a smysl pro detail.
Key services
marketing, UX design, digital applications, presentations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, SVG icons
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional marketing and design studio site with clear branding.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools without explicit consent mechanisms.
  5. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business consistency.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with SVG icons for scalable graphics. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for user tracking and marketing analytics. Hosting is managed by VAS Hosting, as indicated by the domain's name servers. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, providing a good user experience across screen sizes. Performance is moderate, with no significant delays noted. However, the absence of a CMS or framework suggests a custom-built solution, which may require ongoing maintenance. The lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack by incorporating security best practices, accessibility improvements, and SEO enhancements to reduce technical risks and improve operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mediaform.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mediaform.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.