Skip to main content

Security report for medecision.com

Medecision, Inc. · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Medecision, Inc. operates as an integrated health management company specializing in digital care management and healthcare data platforms. The company targets health plans, health systems, third-party administrators, and government entities, offering a comprehensive suite of services including clinical intelligence, utilization management, and social determinants of health solutions. Positioned as an enterprise-level provider, Medecision emphasizes proven results and advanced analytics to improve health outcomes and operational efficiency. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and rich content tailored to its B2B healthcare audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern marketing and analytics integrations such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, and Drift chat, ensuring robust user engagement and data collection. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, HITRUST certification, and anti-fraud measures, though additional security headers and explicit incident response contacts could enhance resilience. Privacy compliance is well addressed with visible cookie consent and comprehensive policies. Overall, Medecision presents a trustworthy and professional digital front aligned with its healthcare technology business model.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching medecision.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention medecision.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
724
Employees
1
Customers
722
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2025-04-15 · 13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for medecision.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –adfs1.medecision.com2025-04-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Medecision holds a strong market position in healthcare technology, focusing on data-driven care management solutions. Its business model revolves around SaaS platforms and consulting services tailored for risk-bearing organizations and population health management. The company leverages partnerships with major marketing and analytics platforms to optimize customer engagement and operational insights. Customer testimonials and HITRUST certification reinforce its credibility. The target customer segments include commercial and community health plans, health systems, third-party administrators, and government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. The company demonstrates growth through advanced clinical intelligence and seamless integration capabilities, positioning itself as a key player in value-based care and digital health transformation.

Security posture

Medecision exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, and click fraud protection via ClickCease. The presence of HITRUST certification indicates adherence to rigorous healthcare security standards. However, the website lacks some recommended security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks such as clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response information and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly visible, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the security measures align well with healthcare industry expectations but could be enhanced with additional transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information on the website to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility compliance to improve user experience for all visitors, including those with disabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Medecision, Inc.
Description
Medecision is an integrated health management company supporting virtual care and digital health.
Key services
Health Data Platform, Clinical Intelligence, Digital Care Management, Utilization Management, Care Coordination, Social Determinants of Health, Consulting Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, HubSpot Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Drift Chat, Hotjar, ClickCease, Recaptcha Enterprise
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, WPBakery, HubSpot Marketing
Platforms
YouTube (embedded video), Google Cloud (likely for recaptcha and analytics)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
  • Click fraud protection via ClickCease
  • HITRUST certification displayed
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, ClickCease
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing, Drift Chat, Triblio
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong focus on healthcare data management and digital care solutions
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and certifications enhance trust
  4. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools
  5. Security posture is good but can be improved with additional headers and explicit incident response info
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and visible
  7. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution for content management and presentation. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Drift chat, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize performance, though overall loading speed is moderate. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. The presence of multiple external domains for analytics and marketing is well managed but includes one suspicious domain (obseu.bzcclandlord.com) which should be reviewed. The technical stack is modern and supports the company's business goals effectively, with opportunities for performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with medecision.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review medecision.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.