Skip to main content

Security report for mcsweeneys.net

McSweeney’s Literary Arts Fund · Media · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

McSweeney’s Internet Tendency is a well-established nonprofit literary arts publisher based in San Francisco, operating since 1998. The organization offers daily humor content, publishes literary magazines and books, and runs an online store. Their market position is strong within the nonprofit literary media sector, supported by a consistent brand and active audience engagement through multiple channels including social media and Patreon. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks, New Relic monitoring, and Google Analytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure with good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure forms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is moderate, with a privacy policy present but lacking explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mcsweeneys.net

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mcsweeneys.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
173
Employees
0
Customers
140
Third parties
33
Weak passwords
30%

10 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mcsweeneys.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

McSweeney’s operates primarily in the media and nonprofit sectors, focusing on literary arts publishing and humor content. Their business model includes content publishing, subscriptions, donations, and retail sales through their online store. The organization targets literary enthusiasts and general audiences interested in humor and culture. Partnerships with related literary magazines and platforms like Patreon enhance their ecosystem. The company demonstrates growth through diversified content offerings and active community engagement. Their nonprofit status and clear mission support credibility and trust in their market niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The use of third-party analytics and monitoring tools is standard but requires ongoing vigilance to avoid vulnerabilities. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Enhancing security headers and publishing incident response information would strengthen their security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
McSweeney’s Literary Arts Fund
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
McSweeney’s Literary Arts Fund
Description
McSweeney’s is an independent nonprofit publishing company based in San Francisco. It operates a daily humor website and publishes Timothy McSweeney’s Quarterly Concern, Illustoria, and a selection of books under various imprints. They also run an online store and accept donations.
Key services
Daily humor content, Publishing literary magazines and books, Online retail store, Donations and subscriptions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, New Relic Browser Agent, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Typekit Fonts
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper labels

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Constant Contact
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner visible on homepage.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual for a .net domain.
  4. Site uses modern analytics and performance monitoring tools.
  5. Clear nonprofit publishing business model with multiple content types.
  6. No obvious security policy or incident response information published.
  7. Contact information includes email and physical address in San Francisco.
  8. Social media presence is active across multiple platforms.
  9. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with New Relic for performance monitoring and Google Analytics for user tracking. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit, and the site is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design. The HTML structure is valid and semantic, supporting accessibility and SEO best practices. Performance is fast with preconnect and preload optimizations. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and explicit privacy consent mechanisms to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mcsweeneys.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mcsweeneys.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.