Skip to main content

Security report for mcribis.cz

CRIF - Czech Credit Bureau · Finance · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CRIF - Czech Credit Bureau operates the Cribis.cz platform, providing comprehensive credit and risk information services primarily for businesses in the Czech and Slovak Republics. The platform offers tools for screening companies and individuals, including credit reports, relationship diagrams, monitoring services, and AML compliance checks. The company positions itself as a trusted partner for businesses seeking to mitigate risks associated with unreliable partners. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as React and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, including Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. The site demonstrates good privacy compliance with a detailed cookie consent mechanism and a comprehensive privacy policy. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some HTTP security headers are not confirmed. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap, reducing domain registration trustworthiness, but the website content and business information appear professional and credible overall.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mcribis.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mcribis.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mcribis.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets B2B customers requiring credit and risk information on business partners in Czechia and Slovakia. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating over 90 data sources into a single platform with customizable reports and monitoring. The business model is subscription and query-based, offering add-on modules for international verification and payment registry access. The presence of a helpdesk and contact form supports customer service. The company is part of the larger CRIF group, enhancing market credibility. No direct revenue or financial data is disclosed, but the extensive service portfolio and professional presentation indicate a mature market presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent tools to comply with GDPR. It employs security best practices such as sanitizing inputs (DOMPurify) and limiting cookie scope. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, which could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The integration of multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts introduces moderate tracking but appears managed with user consent. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from formalized policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan.
  2. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Verify and enforce comprehensive HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, etc.).
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CRIF – Czech Credit Bureau, a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CRIF - Czech Credit Bureau
Description
Cribis is an effective tool for screening companies and individuals offering a complete overview of audited company’s structure, key management, financial health, warnings and commitments in Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Key services
Credit reports, Relationship diagrams, Monitoring, AML Info Check, Central Register of Executions, Property registry access, International company verification (SkyMinder), Registry of Payment Information (REPI)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, React, Beaver Builder, CookieYes Consent, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
React
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security libraries like DOMPurify

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Microsoft Advertising, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with detailed consent mechanism.
  4. Multiple analytics and marketing tools integrated with moderate tracking.
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  6. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Beaver Builder for layout and React for some frontend components, indicating a modern and flexible tech stack. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features and SEO optimization via Yoast SEO. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts and rich media content. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, supporting granular user preferences. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence but could be optimized for speed and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mcribis.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mcribis.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.