Skip to main content

Security report for mcity.lv

MCITY OFFICES · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MCITY OFFICES operates as a commercial real estate rental business specializing in office and warehouse spaces in Riga, Latvia. The company manages multiple business centers including MCITY Astras, MCITY Ģertrūdes, and MCITY Ulbrokas, targeting businesses and professionals seeking functional and modern office environments. Their market position is that of a local provider with a focused portfolio of rental properties. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and service descriptions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and the Houzez real estate theme, incorporating modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery. It integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking and Bitrix24 CRM forms for lead management. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has implemented a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, additional security headers are not detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found during analysis. The lack of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully assess domain legitimacy, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate business. Overall, MCITY OFFICES presents a trustworthy and professional online presence suitable for its business model. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policy publication, and WHOIS transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mcity.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MCITY OFFICES is positioned as a niche commercial real estate rental provider in Riga, focusing on office and warehouse spaces. Their competitive advantage lies in managing multiple business centers with modern facilities. The business model relies on leasing functional office spaces to local businesses and professionals. Revenue streams are primarily rental income. The target customer segment includes SMEs and larger companies requiring office premises. The website's integration with Bitrix24 CRM suggests an organized lead management process. Growth indicators are not explicitly stated, but the presence of multiple properties and updated listings indicates active operations. No significant partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates room for improvement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which may limit transparency and readiness. The use of third-party plugins and themes necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No signs of exposed sensitive data or malware were detected. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by cookie consent but lacks a visible privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small commercial website but should be enhanced to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to reduce vulnerability risks.
  5. Consider obtaining and publishing domain WHOIS information or using a registrar that provides transparent registration data to improve legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MCITY OFFICES
Description
Biroju noma Rīgā: Biroju centri Astras, Ģertrūdes, Ulbrokas. Iznomāt funkcionālas, plašas biroja telpas ar mūsdienīgo remontu. Biroju centri MCITY.
Key services
Office space rental, Warehouse space rental, Business center facilities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Houzez theme and plugins, Google Analytics, Bootstrap, jQuery, Revolution Slider
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin, Bitrix24 CRM forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to commercial real estate rental.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress with Elementor and Houzez theme).
  5. Cookie consent banner present indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected on the homepage HTML.
  7. Google Analytics and Bitrix24 CRM forms are used for tracking and lead capture.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor and the Houzez theme, which is specialized for real estate listings. It leverages Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site uses Revolution Slider for visual banners and Bitrix24 CRM forms for lead capture. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, but security enhancements and performance tuning could be beneficial.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mcity.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mcity.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.