Skip to main content

Security report for mcanvas.com

mCanvas · Media · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

mCanvas is a digital advertising company specializing in immersive and interactive ad experiences across smart devices including mobile and connected TV platforms. The company positions itself as a premium provider of innovative advertising solutions that leverage sensor-based technology to enhance brand engagement and recall. Their website demonstrates a strong brand presence with client testimonials, prestigious awards, and partnerships with leading agencies and brands. Technically, the site is built on Webflow, uses modern analytics and consent management tools, and implements security best practices such as HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise. However, the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages and missing WHOIS domain registration data present compliance and trust challenges. Overall, the website is professional and well-designed, targeting brands and advertisers seeking advanced digital marketing solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mcanvas.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

mCanvas operates in the media and technology sectors, focusing on B2B services for brand advertisers. Their business model revolves around delivering sensor-led, interactive ad creatives that drive higher engagement and brand impact. The company boasts a global reach with over 1 billion users accessible through their platform. They maintain strong relationships with major brands and advertising agencies, as evidenced by displayed logos and testimonials. The lack of publicly available company registration and privacy documentation suggests areas for improvement in transparency and regulatory compliance. Their marketing tools and analytics usage indicate a mature digital marketing infrastructure supporting data-driven campaigns.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and the use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is managed via CookiePro, indicating attention to privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in transparency and incident readiness. Enhancing header configurations and publishing security policies would strengthen the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Provide explicit incident response and security contact information to enhance trust and readiness.
  5. Continue to maintain and improve cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR compliance indicators.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
mCanvas
Description
mCanvas provides experiential storytelling across smart devices, delivering immersive ad experiences to evoke emotion, capture attention, and craft connections with audiences.
Key services
immersive interactive mobile ads, sensor-led advertising, CTV advertising formats, omnichannel ad experiences
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, CookiePro Consent Management, Webflow CMS, Lottie animations
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise used on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms, CookiePro Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via CookiePro.
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. Strong branding with client logos and testimonials.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosting, leveraging modern web technologies such as Lottie animations for interactive content. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and uses Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form security. Cookie consent is managed by CookiePro. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with some heavy multimedia content. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business model, though improvements in security header implementation and privacy documentation are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mcanvas.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mcanvas.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.