Skip to main content

Security report for maybebar.cz

Jenda Catering s.r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Maybe Bar is a small hospitality business located in Pardubice, Czech Republic, offering a bar, café, and longboard showroom experience. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence with clear contact information and social media integration. The business targets mature adults interested in nightlife, drinks, and social events, positioning itself as a local niche venue with a focus on quality mixed drinks and music. Technically, the site uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Skel for responsive design, delivering moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, there is a lack of advanced security headers and privacy compliance documentation, which could be improved to enhance trust and regulatory adherence. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business information, supporting legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maybebar.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector with a focus on bar and café services combined with a unique longboard showroom offering. Its market position is local and niche, appealing to a mature audience seeking quality drinks and social entertainment. The company, Jenda Catering s.r.o., is clearly identified with registration details provided, indicating a transparent and legitimate operation. The website supports the business model by promoting events and social media engagement, although it lacks formal privacy and cookie policies. The absence of advanced marketing or tracking tools suggests a low reliance on digital advertising, focusing instead on organic community engagement. Growth potential could be enhanced by expanding digital marketing and compliance efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No forms are present, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. There is no evidence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are best practices for modern websites. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Security improvements should focus on implementing security headers, privacy documentation, and establishing incident response channels to enhance overall security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability and compliance with standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jenda Catering s.r.o.
Registration number
04346432
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jenda Catering s.r.o.
Description
A bar and café located in the center of Pardubice offering mixed drinks, luxury rum, music, longboard showroom, and social events. The venue targets people looking for entertainment, drinks, and socializing in a relaxed atmosphere.
Key services
Mixed drinks, Luxury rum, Music events, Longboard showroom, Social gatherings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Skel, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Skel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS implied by URL (https://)
  • No forms detected to collect sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a local bar and café with a niche focus on longboarding culture.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No forms present, reducing risk of data leakage but limiting user interaction.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is clearly linked.
  5. No security.txt or incident response contacts found.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. Website design is professional and mobile optimized.
  8. No explicit adult content but alcohol and nightlife content present.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a lightweight tech stack including jQuery and Skel for responsive design, with CSS and HTML5 standards. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized, providing a good user experience. There is no detected CMS or complex backend technology, suggesting a static or simple dynamic site. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and social media links. However, the lack of advanced security headers and privacy mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation is adequate for a small hospitality business but could be modernized with enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maybebar.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maybebar.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.