Skip to main content

Security report for maxizoo.ch

FRESSNAPF · Retail · Switzerland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fressnapf is a large Swiss-based e-commerce retailer specializing in pet products, serving pet owners with a broad range of animal-related goods. The website is professionally designed with good user experience and mobile optimization, leveraging common marketing and analytics technologies such as Adobe Tag Manager and Facebook Connect. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response information, which are critical for compliance and security assurance. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maxizoo.ch

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fressnapf holds a strong market position in the Swiss pet retail sector, operating an e-commerce platform targeting pet owners. The business model focuses on online sales of pet food and accessories. The company appears to have consistent branding and professional content, though explicit contact and policy information is not evident in the provided data. The use of tracking and marketing tools indicates an active digital marketing strategy. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website currently shows a low security posture due to the absence of security headers, lack of visible HTTPS enforcement details, and missing security policies such as vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts. Tracking technologies are present but without clear privacy compliance indicators. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Enhancing security headers, privacy policies, and incident response readiness would significantly improve the security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to build trust and readiness.
  4. Ensure HTTPS is fully enforced and SSL/TLS configuration is strong and up to date.
  5. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FRESSNAPF
Description
Fressnapf is an online pet store offering a wide range of animal products.
Key services
Online sales of pet products, Pet food and accessories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Google Analytics (implied by gtag domains), Facebook Connect, Maxizoo tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Adobe Tag Manager, Maxizoo metrics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Tag Manager, Facebook Connect, Maxizoo tracking
Marketing tools
Adobe Tag Manager, Facebook Connect
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for pet products in Switzerland.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Uses common tracking and marketing technologies including Adobe Tag Manager and Facebook Connect.
  5. No visible security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  7. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including Adobe Tag Manager and integrates with Facebook and Google services for analytics and marketing. The HTML and CSS appear valid and the site is mobile optimized. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified. The technical infrastructure supports a professional e-commerce platform but lacks advanced security configurations and comprehensive privacy mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maxizoo.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maxizoo.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.