Skip to main content

Security report for maxilla.lv

Maxilla · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Maxilla.lv is a professional dental clinic website based in Riga, Latvia, offering a range of dental services including endodontic treatment, prosthetics, implantology, and oral hygiene. The clinic emphasizes quality care, modern technology, and affordability to serve a broad patient base. The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies and Google Analytics for visitor tracking with IP anonymization. While the site is well designed and mobile optimized, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its privacy compliance score. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional image but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maxilla.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention maxilla.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for maxilla.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Maxilla operates as a small healthcare provider specializing in dental services in the Latvian market. Its competitive advantage lies in the use of modern dental technologies and a professional team committed to continuous learning. The business model is service-based, targeting local patients seeking quality dental care. The website supports multilingual access (Latvian, Russian, English) and maintains a social media presence on Facebook. The absence of detailed WHOIS data and privacy policies suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. The clinic's market position is that of a quality-focused local provider with potential for growth through enhanced digital trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google Analytics with IP anonymization, indicating basic security awareness. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces its defense-in-depth. No explicit incident response or security policy information is found, and forms lack visible advanced security controls. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, privacy disclosures, and secure form handling.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Ensure all forms have proper validation and anti-CSRF protections to secure user data.
  4. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration details or use a WHOIS privacy service with transparency.
  5. Enhance incident response readiness by providing security contact information and policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Maxilla
Description
Maxilla is a dental clinic located in Riga offering various dental services focused on health, beauty, and confidence. The clinic emphasizes quality, professional approach, continuous learning, and use of modern technologies and materials. They provide services at affordable prices to a broad patient base.
Key services
Endodontic treatment with microscope, Dental therapy, Prosthetics, Aesthetic dental restoration, Surgery, Implantology, Oral hygiene, Periodontosis prevention, Teeth whitening
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 1.10.2, Google Fonts (Roboto), Google Analytics (gtag.js), Tilda CMS platform, Tilda CDN for assets
Frameworks
Tilda Blocks, Tilda Forms
Platforms
Tilda website builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical and asset URLs)
  • Google Analytics configured with anonymize IP

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional dental clinic site in Latvia
  2. Content is well structured and localized in Latvian with language switch options
  3. Contact info is clearly presented with phone and email
  4. Social media presence limited to Facebook
  5. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  7. No security headers data provided
  8. Uses Tilda CMS and CDN services
  9. Google Analytics implemented with IP anonymization
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies including jQuery 1.10.2. It uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics with IP anonymization for tracking. Assets are served via Tilda's CDN, supporting performance and availability. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks explicit security headers and visible privacy or cookie consent mechanisms. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small healthcare provider but can be improved with enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maxilla.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maxilla.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.