Skip to main content

Security report for maxeon.com

Maxeon Solar Technologies · Energy · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Maxeon Solar Technologies operates as a leading manufacturer and innovator in the solar energy sector, providing advanced solar panels and technology solutions tailored for homeowners, businesses, and power plants. The company leverages a partner installer network to deliver superior solar solutions globally. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and strong branding consistent with a large enterprise in the energy industry. Technically, the site is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing modern web technologies and integrated consent management for privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. The absence of WHOIS domain registration data is a notable gap but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional site and external references. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency and publishing vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maxeon.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention maxeon.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
251
Employees
48
Customers
129
Third parties
74
Weak passwords
4%

Latest record dated 2026-06-13 · 9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for maxeon.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –login.maxeon.com2026-06-13
  • –login.maxeon.com2026-05-29
  • –login.maxeon.com2026-05-24
  • –mail.maxeon.com2026-05-21
  • –login.maxeon.com2026-05-12

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Maxeon Solar Technologies holds a strong market position in the renewable energy sector, focusing on solar panel manufacturing and technology innovation. Their business model includes direct sales and a partner installer network, targeting diverse customer segments such as homeowners, commercial businesses, and utility-scale power plants. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem, evidenced by dedicated portals and extensive resource documentation. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on sustainability and quality, supported by certifications and case studies. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and investor relations presence. The company operates primarily in the United States with a global reach, positioning itself as a key player in the energy transition market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and HSTS, reducing risks of man-in-the-middle attacks. The use of a consent management platform aligns with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism limits transparency and preparedness visibility. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing additional security headers like Content-Security-Policy and providing clear security contact channels to enhance incident response readiness and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers by adding Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents or abuse reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Maxeon Solar Technologies
Description
Explore Maxeon's cutting-edge solar panels and technology for homeowners, businesses, and power plants. Connect with partner installers for superior solar solutions.
Key services
Solar panel manufacturing, Solar technology innovation, Partner installer network, Technical documentation and training
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, jQuery 3.3.1, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management, Squarespace proprietary scripts
Frameworks
Squarespace
Platforms
Squarespace Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management platform

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured with comprehensive content.
  2. No signs of adult or malicious content.
  3. Uses Squarespace CMS and hosting platform.
  4. Includes social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and integrated with consent management.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  9. Multiple external domains related to partners and corporate resources are linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace CMS platform, leveraging its hosting and content management capabilities. It uses jQuery 3.3.1 and integrates Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, typical for a CMS-based site with rich media content. The technical implementation includes proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data). There is no indication of technical debt or deprecated technologies, but opportunities exist to optimize loading speed and enhance security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maxeon.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maxeon.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.