Skip to main content

Security report for maxbadkamers.nl

MAX Badkamers · Real Estate · Netherlands

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MAX Badkamers is a Dutch company specializing in high-quality bathroom renovations and bathroom elements. Founded in 2019, the company targets homeowners seeking safe, comfortable, and modern bathroom solutions. The website reflects a professional business with a strong customer satisfaction rating (9.2/10 from 322 reviews) and offers services such as showroom visits, free brochures, and home advice. The business operates primarily in the real estate sector, focusing on home improvement. Technically, the website is built on a modern Next.js framework with React, integrating various marketing and analytics tools including Cookiebot for cookie consent management, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Bing Ads. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of explicit security headers and published security policies limits the security maturity. Privacy compliance is partially met with a cookie consent mechanism but lacks a clearly accessible privacy policy and terms of service. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maxbadkamers.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MAX Badkamers holds a solid market position in the Dutch bathroom renovation market, leveraging positive customer reviews and a clear service offering. The business model combines product sales with installation and advisory services, targeting residential customers. The company uses a custom CMS and modern web technologies to deliver a responsive and engaging user experience. Partnerships with review platforms and marketing service providers support customer acquisition and retention. The absence of detailed business contact information on the website suggests a focus on lead generation through forms and indirect contact channels. Growth indicators include active marketing campaigns and integration with multiple advertising networks. Strategic observations include the need to publish comprehensive privacy and security policies to align with GDPR and build further customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a robust cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. The use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics services increases the attack surface and requires careful data protection management. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing incident response protocols.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy, including security contact emails.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for improved user experience and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to minimize privacy risks and ensure GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MAX Badkamers
Description
MAX Badkamers biedt u een nieuwe, veilige en comfortabele badkamer. Wij plaatsen hoogwaardige badkamers op korte termijn, met langetermijnplezier.
Key services
Bathroom renovation, Bathroom elements supply, Showroom visits, Free brochure requests, Home advice services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, Sendinblue, Convertexperiments
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Bing UET, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Bing UET
Marketing tools
Sendinblue, Convertexperiments
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern Next.js framework with React.
  2. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics services integrated.
  6. Good customer trust signals via external review platform (Klanten Vertellen).
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Next.js, a modern React-based framework, indicating a contemporary and scalable technical infrastructure. The use of server-side rendering and static asset optimization suggests good performance practices, though no explicit performance metrics were available. Integration with Cookiebot ensures compliance with cookie consent regulations. The site uses multiple external scripts for analytics, marketing, and affiliate tracking, which may impact load times and privacy. Hosting is provided by team.blue nl B.V., a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and preloaded assets for faster rendering. However, the absence of security headers and limited accessibility features indicate areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility measures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maxbadkamers.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maxbadkamers.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.