Skip to main content

Security report for maurinaklinika.lv

Dr. Mauriņa klīnika · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dr. Mauriņa klīnika is a leading private healthcare provider in Latvia specializing in advanced laser medicine and vein treatment services. The clinic boasts modern facilities with multiple operating rooms and consultation spaces, serving over 100,000 patients annually. Their market position is strong within the Baltic region, emphasizing innovation and personalized care. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support and comprehensive service offerings. Technically, the site uses modern web standards, integrates analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity, and provides a good user experience across devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site projects professionalism and trustworthiness, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maurinaklinika.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic operates in the healthcare sector with a focus on specialized medical services such as phlebology, proctology, dermatology, and plastic surgery. Their business model centers on private patient care with additional offerings like e-privilege cards and installment payment options. The presence of partnerships with insurance companies and an e-shop partner (ameda.lv) indicates a diversified revenue stream and ecosystem. The target audience includes general patients seeking advanced medical treatments in Latvia and surrounding regions. The clinic's strong branding, patient testimonials, and extensive service descriptions support a high level of market trust and competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not visibly present in the HTML source, which could be enhanced to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a healthcare provider's public website but could benefit from additional hardening and disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools for security and privacy compliance.
  4. Enhance WHOIS data availability or provide domain registration information on the website to improve legitimacy verification.
  5. Maintain and update cookie consent mechanisms to comply with evolving privacy regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dr. Mauriņa klīnika
Description
Dr. Mauriņa klīnika ir viena no Eiropā modernākajām lāzermedicīnas un vēnu ārstēšanas klīnikām. 4000 kvadrātmetru platībā iekārtotas sešas operāciju zāles, 18 konsultāciju un procedūru telpas, kā arī 10 mājīgas palātas. Ārstniecības pakalpojumus šeit ik gadu var saņemt vairāk nekā 100 000 pacientu.
Key services
Fleboloģija - vēnu ārstēšana, Proktoloģija, Dermatoloģija, Medicīniskā estētika, Vispārējā ķirurģija, Ultrasonogrāfija, Plastiskā ķirurģija, Sāpju terapija, Konsultācijas reģionos
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by CSS classes and grid system)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async and defer for scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong focus on healthcare services with detailed service descriptions
  3. Multiple language options available (Latvian, English, Russian)
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy mechanisms implemented
  5. Contact information clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards with responsive design principles, likely leveraging Bootstrap framework for layout and styling. JavaScript is used for interactivity and integration with analytics platforms such as Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. The site loads multimedia content efficiently with lazy loading and preload hints. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes are present, supporting inclusive user experience. Performance is moderate with room for optimization in script loading and caching. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detectable from the source. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly healthcare website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maurinaklinika.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maurinaklinika.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.