Skip to main content

Security report for mathereconomics.com

Mather · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mather is a strategic partner for modern media publishers, offering a blend of industry expertise, advanced analytics, and AI-powered technology to enhance revenue and ensure sustainability of media revenue models. The company positions itself as an established player with partnerships across hundreds of publishers, focusing on technology-driven growth. The website is built on WordPress with a moderate technical infrastructure including popular analytics and consent management tools. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks some security headers and formal security policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, impacting trust and legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is professional and content-rich, targeting media companies and publishers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mathereconomics.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mather operates in the media sector, providing technology and analytics services to publishers. Its business model revolves around strategic partnerships and leveraging AI to optimize revenue streams. The company targets media publishers seeking to modernize and sustain their revenue models. The website reflects a medium-sized business with consistent branding and good content quality. The use of advanced analytics and AI indicates a competitive advantage. However, the lack of visible contact information and formal policies may limit trust for new clients. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with marketing and analytics platforms but no explicit partner domains were identified.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from abuse. Consent management is handled by Didomi, indicating attention to privacy compliance. However, the site lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, and no incident response contacts are published. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding formal policies, security headers, and clearer contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear contact information to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mather
Description
Mather is the modern publisher's go-to strategic partner, blending deep industry expertise, advanced analytics, and AI-powered tech to supercharge revenue and ensure the sustainability of your media revenue model.
Key services
Industry expertise, Advanced analytics, AI-powered technology
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, FontAwesome, jQuery, Slider Revolution, Marfeel SDK, Didomi Consent SDK, Shareaholic
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented
  • Consent management via Didomi
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Shareaholic, Marfeel
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Shareaholic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and fully functional with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  3. Privacy and terms of service pages are not clearly found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Didomi.
  5. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used.
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  7. Security best practices partially implemented but missing some headers and policies.
  8. Content is professional and targeted at media publishers.
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and various marketing SDKs. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses multiple third-party scripts for analytics and advertising, which should be monitored for security and privacy compliance. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved accessibility and security header implementation. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but requires ongoing maintenance and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mathereconomics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mathereconomics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.