Skip to main content

Security report for masariga.lv

Māsa · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Māsa is a small hospitality business operating a restaurant in Riga, Latvia, focusing on local and seasonal cuisine to create memorable dining experiences. The website is built on the Readymag platform and provides essential contact information including phone, email, and physical address. The business emphasizes tradition and quality, targeting a general audience interested in authentic local dining. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and Typekit fonts for branding consistency. The site is mobile optimized and presents a professional design, though navigation is basic due to its single-page nature. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the domain appears new and consistent with a recently founded business. Overall, the site is trustworthy but could improve compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching masariga.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Māsa positions itself as a local restaurant in Riga offering seasonal and local products, appealing to customers seeking authentic culinary experiences. The business model is straightforward hospitality with direct dining services and online table booking. The website content and social media presence support brand awareness and customer engagement. The lack of detailed business registration data limits deeper insights, but the new domain and professional presentation suggest a startup or recently launched venture. The use of tracking pixels indicates an interest in marketing analytics and customer behavior understanding. Growth potential exists with improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from enhanced headers, formal policies, and vulnerability management processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate commitment to security transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to ensure they do not introduce security or privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Māsa
Description
Together with Māsa, we create memories of the future. Every day, every season, we put on the table a real and lasting experience in our memories. With local products and seasonal ingredients, our recipes and memories travel through time. Together, we create new traditions and a place where time disappears.
Key services
Restaurant dining, Table booking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Readymag platform, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Typekit fonts
Platforms
Readymag
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a single-page restaurant site built on Readymag platform
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  3. Contact info includes phone, email, and physical address in Riga, Latvia
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  5. Uses Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and TikTok Pixel for tracking
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Mobile optimized with good design quality
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
  10. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Readymag platform, leveraging its CMS and hosting infrastructure. It uses modern web fonts from Typekit and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site loads moderate resources and is mobile optimized, providing a good user experience on various devices. However, the lack of advanced SEO and accessibility features suggests room for technical improvement. The hosting and CDN appear reliable, but no explicit hosting provider details were found. The site does not expose sensitive data and uses HTTPS, but security headers are missing, which is a technical risk. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business but could be enhanced for better security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with masariga.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review masariga.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.