Skip to main content

Security report for maryanning.ch

Media · Switzerland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.maryanning.ch is a promotional platform for the children's animation film 'Mary Anning', targeting families and children primarily in Switzerland. It offers rich interactive content including a fossil hunting contest across multiple Swiss cities, educational resources for schools, and a mini-game to engage users. The site uses modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Swiper.js for UI components, and Kaboom.js for the game engine, alongside Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking. The design is professional and mobile-optimized, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap given the use of tracking technologies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maryanning.ch

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mary Anning positions itself as a niche media project promoting a family-friendly animation film with an educational and interactive approach. Its business model revolves around film promotion combined with audience engagement through contests and games. The site collaborates with various partner locations across Switzerland for the fossil hunting contest, indicating a partnership ecosystem. The target audience is children and families, with content localized in French and links to German and Italian versions. The project appears small in scale, with no parent company or subsidiaries identified. The use of structured data and SEO best practices suggests a focus on discoverability and audience reach.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading for analytics scripts, which are positive security practices. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness. The contact mechanism is limited to a popup contact form without direct emails or phone numbers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional headers, privacy compliance measures, and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and security culture.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Consider adding verified contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Mary Anning, le film d’animation pour enfants à découvrir en famille : bande-annonce, avant-premières, concours et prix à gagner.
Key services
Film promotion, Interactive fossil hunting contest, Educational resources for schools, Mini-game engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Swiper.js, Kaboom.js (game engine), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website promotes a children’s animation film 'Mary Anning' with rich interactive content.
  2. Includes a fossil hunting contest across multiple Swiss cities with partner locations.
  3. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and game engine for engagement.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. Contact available only via a popup contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  8. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and rich snippets.
  9. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking with no visible consent mechanism.
  10. No signs of WAF or content blocking; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and diverse technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Swiper.js for UI components, and Kaboom.js for an embedded game. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for user tracking and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading improving page load times. There is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. The site could benefit from improved accessibility features and additional security headers to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maryanning.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maryanning.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.