Skip to main content

Security report for markttransparenzstelle.de

Bundesnetzagentur · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website markttransparenzstelle.de is an official German federal agency site related to the Bundesnetzagentur, focusing on market transparency in the energy sector. However, the website content is currently inaccessible due to a security mechanism or Web Application Firewall (WAF) blocking access, as indicated by the rejection message and support ID. This prevents a full analysis of the site's content, policies, and technical infrastructure. The domain registration data aligns with the official agency, supporting legitimacy. Due to the blocked content, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, and no contact or incident response information is available. The site appears to be a government regulatory platform serving the energy market with authoritative data and transparency services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching markttransparenzstelle.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bundesnetzagentur operates as a government entity providing market transparency services in the energy sector in Germany. The domain and name servers confirm its official status. The business model is regulatory and informational, targeting market participants and the general public interested in energy market data. No commercial or advertising elements are visible. The lack of accessible content limits insights into partnerships or growth indicators. The site is positioned as an essential government resource within the energy sector.

Security posture

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the content being blocked by a WAF or security mechanism. No security headers or SSL details are available. The presence of a WAF indicates some level of security hardening. However, the absence of visible privacy policies, cookie consent, or incident response contacts suggests gaps in transparency and compliance. The site should improve accessibility for legitimate users while maintaining security controls. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are observable from the blocked content.

Recommendations

  1. Review and adjust WAF/security settings to allow legitimate user access while maintaining protection.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Provide visible contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Implement and document security headers and HTTPS configuration.
  5. Enhance website content accessibility and technical SEO to improve user experience and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The website content is blocked with a message 'The requested URL was rejected.' and a support ID provided, indicating a WAF or security mechanism is active. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Bundesnetzagentur
Description
The website is related to Bundesnetzagentur, a German federal agency responsible for market transparency in the energy sector.
Key services
Market transparency data and information
Content quality
poor
Branding
consistent

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a security mechanism or WAF.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies.
  3. No contact information or forms are present in the accessible content.
  4. No scripts, external links, or analytics detected due to blocked content.
  5. The website appears to be an official government site related to energy market transparency.
  6. The page displays a support ID for troubleshooting access issues.
  7. No metadata, Open Graph, or structured data found in the accessible content.
  8. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

Due to the blocked content, technical analysis is limited. The HTML is minimal and contains no metadata, scripts, or external resources. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. The domain uses official German government name servers, indicating hosting within a government infrastructure. Performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility cannot be assessed. The site likely uses a restrictive security posture that impacts content availability. Modernization opportunities include improving content delivery and adding structured data for better SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with markttransparenzstelle.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review markttransparenzstelle.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.