Skip to main content

Security report for markel.com

Markel · Finance · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Markel is an established specialty insurance provider offering a wide range of insurance products and services primarily targeting the US market and global customers. The company operates multiple secure portals for customers, brokers, and agents, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and implements comprehensive privacy and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a strong commitment to user privacy and regulatory compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency, which should be further investigated to ensure trustworthiness. The technical stack includes modern frameworks and CDN hosting, supporting fast performance and good accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, but the lack of explicit security policies and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, Markel's digital presence is robust, professional, and trustworthy, with minor gaps in public security documentation and domain registration clarity.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      DMARC not enforcing

      DMARC policy is set to "none"

      What to do: Gradually move to "quarantine" then "reject" policy

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching markel.com

This scan found 9 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
Average
89
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Markel holds a strong position in the specialty insurance sector, serving diverse customer segments including individuals, brokers, and agents. The business model focuses on providing tailored insurance solutions across admitted and non-admitted lines, supported by dedicated online portals. The company leverages partnerships and subsidiary services to extend its offerings, as evidenced by linked domains for various insurance lines and investor relations. Markel's website content and structure reflect a focus on enterprise clients and regulatory compliance, with clear navigation and professional branding. Growth indicators include extensive digital services and global market reach. Strategic observations suggest that enhancing transparency around domain registration and publishing detailed security and incident response policies would strengthen stakeholder confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure login portals. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contact information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and may impact incident handling effectiveness. The WHOIS data absence is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is high but could benefit from enhanced public documentation and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Clarify domain registration details or ensure WHOIS data is publicly accessible to improve trust.
  5. Add a terms of service page to formalize user agreements and legal protections.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Markel
Description
Markel provides specialty insurance coverage and creates seamless solutions across multiple types of insurance risks for the US market and around the globe.
Key services
Specialty insurance coverage, Claims services, Broker and agent portals, Personal lines insurance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Web Vitals
Frameworks
Foundation (CSS framework)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Secure login portals
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Ads
Marketing tools
OneTrust
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional insurance company website with multiple login portals for customers and agents.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy implemented.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact is via contact form.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages explicitly found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not found in WHOIS database, raising questions about domain registration status.
  7. Use of modern technologies and CDN hosting for performance.
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust for cookie management, and the Foundation CSS framework. It uses Sitecore CMS and is hosted on Azure CDN, ensuring fast content delivery and scalability. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO best practices. Performance is fast with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized assets. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to enhance technical transparency by publishing security and compliance documentation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience and robust business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with markel.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review markel.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.