Skip to main content

Security report for markallengroup.com

Mark Allen Group · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mark Allen Group is a well-established media and information company founded in 1985, specializing in connecting specialist audiences through trusted publications, digital resources, conferences, and exhibitions. The website reflects a mature business with a large portfolio of inspirational brands and a significant number of in-person events, positioning it as a key player in the media industry. The digital infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript frameworks such as Alpine.js and Swiper.js, alongside Google Tag Manager and Cookie Script for analytics and compliance, indicating a contemporary and user-friendly technical setup. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is professional, well-branded, and GDPR compliant, though the absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and improving transparency around incident response.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching markallengroup.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention markallengroup.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
548
Employees
0
Customers
545
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
6%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for markallengroup.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media sector with a focus on specialist audiences, leveraging a diversified business model that includes print and digital publications, events, and conferences. Its market position is strengthened by a long history and a broad portfolio of over 140 brands and 100 events. The business targets niche professional communities, providing critical information and networking opportunities. Partnerships such as the subscription service magsubscriptions.com and a dedicated careers portal support its ecosystem. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting strong business credibility. Growth indicators include active newsroom updates and a focus on employee stories, reflecting investment in corporate culture and brand reputation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS usage and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder vulnerability reporting and response. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Cookie Script necessitates regular audits to prevent supply chain risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, published policies, and a security.txt file.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Audit third-party scripts regularly to ensure they do not introduce vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form security with anti-CSRF tokens and input validation to prevent injection attacks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mark Allen Group
Description
Mark Allen is a media and information group connecting specialist audiences through critical information and inspiring events.
Key services
trusted publications, digital resources, conferences, exhibitions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Alpine.js, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Cookie Script
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available from raw output; domain may be newly registered or privacy protected.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Instagram confirmed.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries indicates a contemporary tech stack.
  8. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookie Script.
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern front-end technologies including Alpine.js for reactive UI components and Swiper.js for interactive sliders, indicating a modern and responsive design approach. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, and Cookie Script manages cookie consent, supporting privacy compliance. The site loads resources over HTTPS, suggesting secure transport. Performance appears moderate with video backgrounds and image sliders, which may impact load times but enhance user engagement. Mobile optimization is good with responsive menus and adaptive video sources. Accessibility features such as ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support are present, contributing to a positive user experience. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS solution. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with markallengroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review markallengroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.