Skip to main content

Security report for maresi.lv

Maresi · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Maresi is a small Latvian wellness and beauty salon offering a range of services including whole-body cryotherapy, MYA lymphatic drainage procedures, facial massages, make-up, waxing, and hairdressing. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, featuring clear navigation and mobile optimization. The company maintains an active social media presence and provides clear contact information, enhancing business credibility. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and implements HTTPS with good security headers, alongside a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration insights. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maresi.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Maresi operates as a local service provider in the hospitality sector focused on health and beauty treatments. Its business model centers on direct client services with offerings tailored to wellness and aesthetic care. The company targets general consumers interested in fitness, beauty, and relaxation therapies. The website supports marketing efforts through Google Tag Manager and cookie consent tools, indicating awareness of privacy and analytics needs. While no partnerships or subsidiaries are identified, the business maintains a consistent brand and trust signals such as privacy policies and social media engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes several important security headers, contributing to a good security baseline. Use of Google reCAPTCHA cookies helps mitigate spam and bot activity. Cookie consent is actively managed, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response page suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could enhance security culture and incident handling.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to minimize vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Expand privacy compliance documentation and data retention policies for transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Maresi"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Maresi
Description
Salons veselībai offering modern whole-body cryotherapy, MYA procedure for lymphatic drainage, cellulite treatment, tissue and muscle toning, various massages, make-up, waxing, and hairdressing services.
Key services
Kriosauna (Cryosauna), MYA Procedūra (Lymphatic drainage and cellulite treatment), Sejas masāžas (Facial massages), Make-up, Vaksācija (Waxing), Frizieris (Hairdressing), Dāvanu kartes (Gift cards)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes cookie consent, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA cookies
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Elementor builder.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  6. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond basic privacy policy.
  7. No terms of service or security incident response information found.
  8. No signs of adult or explicit content.
  9. Website uses HTTPS with good security headers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern front-end libraries and Google Fonts for styling. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of fonts and images. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin metadata. No hosting provider details were identified. The technical stack is typical for small to medium-sized service websites, with opportunities to improve accessibility and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maresi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maresi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.