Skip to main content

Security report for maquettica.eu

Real Estate · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Maquettica is a specialized business focused on creating architectural models, including development, conceptual, historical, industrial, interior, landscape, masterplan, and monochrome models. The website presents a professional and visually consistent brand image targeting architects, developers, and clients interested in architectural scale models. The business operates in the real estate sector with a niche service offering. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Flatsome theme, incorporating common technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google Maps API. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and no visible incident response or security policy information. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in security and compliance areas to enhance trust and user protection.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maquettica.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Maquettica positions itself as a niche provider of architectural modeling services, catering primarily to professionals in architecture, development, and planning. The business model revolves around custom model creation, likely generating revenue through project-based contracts. The website content is focused and relevant, indicating a clear target audience. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies from the data provided. The use of WordPress and Flatsome theme suggests a cost-effective digital presence. The lack of detailed business information, such as company registration or VAT numbers, limits deeper business intelligence insights. Marketing relies on Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and performance measurement. The absence of contact details and policies may impact customer trust and conversion.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense against common web attacks like clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and cross-site scripting. No forms or input fields were detected on the homepage content, reducing immediate attack vectors, but also limiting user interaction. There is no visible security or incident response contact information, which is a gap in preparedness for handling security incidents. The use of common third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Google Maps is standard but requires monitoring for privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from enhancements in headers, policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security) to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Maquettica is a business specializing in architectural models, showcasing various types such as development, conceptual, historical, industrial, interior, landscape, masterplan, and monochrome models.
Key services
Development models, Conceptual models, Historical models, Industrial models, Interior models, Landscape models, Masterplan models, Monochrome models
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Flatsome theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and fully functional with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to EURid privacy policy.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with Flatsome theme and common analytics tools.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No visible forms for contact or data collection on the homepage content provided.
  9. No security or incident response contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Flatsome theme, a popular e-commerce and business theme. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Google Maps API is used, likely for location display. The site loads fonts and images with lazy loading techniques, improving performance. The HTML structure is complex but well-formed, indicating a professional build. However, no advanced SEO structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph meta tags were detected in the provided content, which could improve social sharing and search engine visibility. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Performance is moderate with some prefetching of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be improved with SEO enhancements and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maquettica.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maquettica.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.