Skip to main content

Security report for maquet.com

Getinge AB · Healthcare · Sweden

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Getinge AB is a leading global medtech company specializing in products and solutions for hospitals and life science institutions. Their offerings span intensive care, cardiovascular procedures, operating rooms, sterile reprocessing, digital health, pharmaceutical production, and research laboratories. The company targets healthcare professionals and institutions, providing integrated solutions to improve clinical outcomes and optimize workflows. The website reflects a strong market position with a comprehensive range of services and a commitment to sustainability and innovation. Technically, the website employs modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for cookie consent management, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and accessible, with good SEO practices. The presence of multiple regional versions indicates a mature digital infrastructure supporting global operations. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and a dedicated security policy page. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy of the domain, matching the company’s identity and location. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, compliance, and trustworthiness, supporting Getinge’s reputation as a reliable medtech provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maquet.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Getinge AB operates in the healthcare sector with a focus on medtech solutions. Their business model is B2B, serving hospitals and life science institutions worldwide. The company leverages a broad portfolio of products and services, including technical and digital services, financial services, and educational offerings. Their market positioning is strong, supported by a global presence and a commitment to sustainability and innovation. The website’s multilingual support and regional targeting indicate strategic market segmentation. Partnerships and service portals enhance customer engagement and operational efficiency. The company’s content and navigation reflect a mature and professional approach to digital presence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. The use of trusted third-party services like Google Tag Manager and OneTrust is positive, but continuous monitoring of third-party scripts is recommended. Overall, the site maintains a secure environment suitable for its audience but should consider additional security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Create and make accessible a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program with a security.txt file and clear contact channels for reporting security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing contact information for the Data Protection Officer and incident response team.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Getinge AB
Description
Getinge provides hospitals and life science institutions with products and solutions aiming to improve clinical results and optimize workflows. Offering includes solutions for intensive care, cardiovascular procedures, operating rooms, sterile reprocessing and life science.
Key services
Intensive Care, Cardiovascular Procedures, Operating Room, Sterile Reprocessing, Digital Health, Pharmaceutical Production, Research Laboratories, Technical Services, Digital Services, Financial Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, VideoIndexer, TinySlider, SystemJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URLs)
  • Cookie consent banner with preference center
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  3. Strong branding consistency with Getinge AB
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  5. Multiple language and regional versions available
  6. Use of modern tracking and consent technologies
  7. No exposed sensitive data or security issues detected in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The presence of SystemJS suggests modular JavaScript loading. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization information. Performance is moderate, with video content and sliders implemented for rich user experience. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details were not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly digital presence with opportunities for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maquet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maquet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.