Skip to main content

Security report for mannigroup.com

Manni Group · Energy · Italy

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Manni Group is a well-established Italian industrial company specializing in steel processing, sandwich panels, energy efficiency, and off-site construction technologies. The company has a strong market position in Europe with multiple subsidiaries and a focus on innovation and sustainability. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and optimized for user experience and SEO. Technically, it uses WordPress with modern integrations such as HubSpot and Google Analytics, and implements good security practices including HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, there is room for improvement in DNS security and publishing explicit security policies. Overall, the security posture is strong with no critical vulnerabilities detected. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mannigroup.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Manni Group operates in the energy, manufacturing, and real estate sectors with a business model centered on industrial manufacturing and service provision for construction and energy efficiency. The company targets professionals in architecture, engineering, and sustainable building. It leverages partnerships with academic institutions and has a strong ESG focus. The presence of multiple subsidiaries and specialized business units indicates a diversified portfolio. The company maintains a professional digital presence with active content marketing and educational initiatives, supporting growth and market leadership.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, domain locking, and use of reCAPTCHA on forms. Cookie consent is managed via a reputable third-party solution with per-purpose consent, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of DNSSEC and a published security policy or incident response contact are gaps. The site would benefit from additional security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and all plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Add additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Manni Group
Description
Manni Group guida l’innovazione nella lavorazione e nell’utilizzo dell’acciaio in tutte le sue applicazioni. Sviluppiamo soluzioni e servizi d'avanguardia in termini di ingegneria delle strutture, di efficienza energetica e di sostenibilità ambientale.
Key services
steel processing, sandwich panel production, energy efficiency solutions, off-site construction technologies, building management and IoT solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.4.16, Yoast SEO plugin, HubSpot forms and analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Iubenda cookie solution, jQuery, Google Maps API
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled site
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with per-purpose consent
  • Domain locked with EPP status flags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot forms and analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Strong focus on sustainability and innovation in steel and construction sectors.
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy compliance mechanisms implemented.
  4. Use of multiple languages with hreflang tags for internationalization.
  5. Presence of multiple subsidiaries and specialized business units.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
  7. Use of reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing.
  8. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.4.16 with Yoast SEO and HubSpot integrations, indicating a modern and extensible platform. It uses CDN services for media delivery and Google APIs for maps and analytics. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO metadata and structured data. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts and large images, but overall user experience is smooth. Technical debt is minimal but updating WordPress and plugins is recommended. The infrastructure appears stable with no critical technical risks identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mannigroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mannigroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.