Skip to main content

Security report for manet.lv

SIA «Manet» · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA «Manet» is a Latvian holding company specializing in sustainable green technologies, integrating renewable energy, construction, and waste management solutions. The company operates through a portfolio of subsidiaries focused on solar, wind, hydro power, biogas cogeneration, and waste recycling. The website presents a professional image targeting investors and stakeholders interested in sustainable growth and green tech innovation. Technically, the website uses Bootstrap and custom JavaScript with a responsive design, though it lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the visible business information and contact details support legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching manet.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention manet.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
9
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for manet.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Manet holds a medium-sized position in the Latvian green tech market, managing 8 companies across 10 industries. Its business model is a holding structure that leverages synergies among subsidiaries to accelerate green technology development and deployment. The company targets investors seeking sustainable growth opportunities. The website highlights key subsidiaries and their activities, providing physical addresses and registration numbers, which enhances credibility. Partnerships with companies like gplatvia.eu and mosk.lv indicate a collaborative ecosystem. However, the lack of privacy and cookie policies and limited contact channels suggest areas for operational maturity improvement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS assumed but no explicit security headers detected. There are no visible forms collecting sensitive data, reducing immediate risk exposure. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The lack of WHOIS data restricts domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency, header implementation, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve security posture.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Include incident response contact information to facilitate security issue reporting.
  5. Verify and improve SSL/TLS configuration and perform regular security audits.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA «Manet»
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA «Manet»
Description
Integrating Renewable Energy, Construction, and Waste Management Solutions for a greener tomorrow. Manet is a holding company focused on sustainability, uniting multiple green tech companies across solar, wind, hydro, construction, and waste management sectors.
Key services
Waste recycling, Biogas cogeneration, Solar power farm development, Biofuel and waste combustion CHP plant planning, Wind farm operations and reconstruction, Responsible waste management and recycling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, Custom CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed but not confirmed from data
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear business focus on sustainability and green technology.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is limited to email and physical addresses; no phone numbers or social media links found.
  4. No visible forms collecting user data, reducing immediate privacy risks.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. No security headers or advanced security features detected in provided data.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap and custom CSS/JS, providing a responsive and visually appealing design. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal with meta description but no Open Graph or structured data detected. No CMS or hosting provider information is available. The site lacks analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking but also limited marketing insights. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to enhance SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with manet.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review manet.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.