Skip to main content

Security report for mandradesa-eeagrantsgr.gr

Energy · Greece

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mandradesa-eeagrantsgr.gr represents a regional public infrastructure project focused on the supply and installation of an innovative desalination unit with brine treatment and renewable energy integration in Alepochori, Municipality of Mandra-Eidyllia, Greece. The site primarily serves local residents and stakeholders interested in water supply and environmental sustainability. The business model is project-based, targeting a niche market within the energy sector. The content is presented in Greek and provides basic information about the project objectives and benefits. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, with jQuery and Swiper libraries for frontend functionality. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No advanced hosting or CDN details were identified. The site uses HTTPS, but no detailed SSL configuration or security headers were detected, indicating room for improvement in security hardening. From a security perspective, the website lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, terms of service, and incident response contacts. No security headers or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found. The absence of contact information and security best practices reduces the overall security posture. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the content is fully accessible and safe for general audiences. Overall, the website scores moderately on AI evaluation, with strengths in business relevance and basic technical implementation but weaknesses in privacy compliance, security practices, and contact transparency. Strategic improvements in security headers, policy disclosures, and contact information would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mandradesa-eeagrantsgr.gr

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
33
Average
51
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project is positioned as a small-scale, important regional initiative in the energy sector, focusing on sustainable water supply solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in integrating desalination with renewable energy, addressing local environmental challenges. The business model is likely funded or supported by grants or municipal budgets, targeting residents and local authorities. There is no evidence of commercial revenue streams or partnerships from the website content. The lack of visible certifications or trust signals suggests a need for stronger partnership ecosystem development and public communication. Growth indicators are limited due to the project's niche and regional scope.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The website uses HTTPS but lacks essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, reducing readiness for security events. The absence of contact emails and phone numbers further limits communication channels for security issues. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security culture appears minimal, with significant gaps in compliance and best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide a security.txt file or equivalent.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Προμήθεια και εγκατάσταση καινοτόμου μονάδας αφαλάτωσης με επεξεργασία άλμης και ΑΠΕ στο Αλεποχώρι Δήμου Μάνδρας – Ειδυλλίας, εξασφαλίζοντας αδιάλειπτη και ορθολογική υδροδότηση και συμβάλλοντας στην άμβλυνση του περιβαλλοντικού προβλήματος.
Key services
Supply and installation of desalination unit, Brine treatment, Renewable energy integration
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Swiper
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Elementor builder.
  2. Content is in Greek and relates to a desalination project in Alepochori, Greece.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. No forms detected in the truncated HTML content.
  8. Site uses HTTPS but SSL configuration details are not provided.
  9. No social media links or business certifications found.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern CMS platform (WordPress) with Elementor as the page builder, leveraging jQuery and Swiper libraries for interactive elements. The site loads moderate CSS and JS assets, with some custom styles and scripts. Mobile optimization is basic but present. SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags are included but limited in scope. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing asset delivery and caching. Accessibility features are minimal, suggesting opportunities for enhancement to meet standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mandradesa-eeagrantsgr.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mandradesa-eeagrantsgr.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.