Skip to main content

Security report for mandmark.com

MANDMARK · Media · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MANDMARK is an independent communication procurement and media audit agency based in Latvia, founded in 2013. The company specializes in managing creative and media procurement processes, conducting media and process audits, and performing research and public opinion surveys. Their target audience includes public and private sector clients seeking expert services in communication procurement and media auditing. The website is built on the Berta.me platform, uses modern web technologies, and is moderately optimized for mobile devices. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website presents a professional image but would benefit from improved security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mandmark.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mandmark.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mandmark.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MANDMARK holds a niche position in the Latvian media and communication procurement market, leveraging proprietary tools and methodologies tailored to local market specifics. Their business model focuses on consultancy and process management services, targeting marketing specialists and company leaders in both public and private sectors. The company demonstrates consistent branding and provides client testimonials as trust signals. The absence of social media presence and limited digital marketing tools suggest a focus on direct client relationships rather than broad online marketing. The domain age and registration data support the legitimacy and stability of the business.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense against certain attack vectors. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, posing legal and reputational risks. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, minimizing privacy concerns from tracking but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR
  3. Deploy security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency and readiness
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to enhance user experience insights
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MANDMARK
Description
Mandmark ir neatkarīga komunikāciju iepirkumu un mediju audita aģentūra. Mēs esam eksperti mediju un radošajos iepirkumos publiskajā un privātajā sektorā, bartera iepirkumos, mediju auditā un sabiedriskās domas pētījumos.
Key services
Creative procurement process management, Media procurement process management, Media and process audits, Research and survey execution, Public opinion studies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Jura), Berta.me CMS
Platforms
Berta.me website builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is in Latvian language
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found
  3. Contact information is provided but no contact forms detected
  4. No social media links found
  5. Website built using Berta.me platform
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Berta.me CMS platform, utilizing HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with Google Fonts integration. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear navigation structure, though some accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with no evident broken elements. The domain is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC and is locked against unauthorized changes. No advanced web frameworks or analytics tools are detected. The technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mandmark.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mandmark.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.