Skip to main content

Security report for manaredze.lv

Latvijas Amerikas acu centrs · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website manaredze.lv represents the Redzes ekselences centrs, a network of eye care clinics operated by Latvijas Amerikas acu centrs (LAAC), the first private eye clinic in the Baltics founded in 1993. The business offers a comprehensive range of vision correction services including glasses, contact lenses, night lenses, laser correction procedures, and lens implantation. The company targets patients of all ages seeking professional eye diagnostics and treatment in Latvia, with multiple physical locations in Riga. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and provides detailed service information and contact options, including a GDPR-compliant contact form. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and a live chat widget (JivoSite). It is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and privacy measures like IP anonymization and cookie consent implemented. However, security headers and explicit security policies are missing, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Despite this, the website content and business information appear consistent and legitimate for a healthcare provider in Latvia. The site maintains a moderate to high trust level with clear contact information, social media presence, and professional branding. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with good content quality and privacy compliance, but could improve security transparency and WHOIS data availability to enhance trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching manaredze.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Redzes ekselences centrs operates as a healthcare service provider specializing in eye and vision care in Latvia. It benefits from the established reputation of Latvijas Amerikas acu centrs, leveraging a network of clinics to provide comprehensive vision correction solutions. The business model focuses on direct patient services including diagnostics, corrective lenses, laser surgeries, and lens implantations. The target market includes patients of all ages, both local and international. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its long-standing presence since 1993, full spectrum of services, and integration of advanced medical technologies. The website supports patient engagement through detailed service descriptions, multiple contact channels, and social media. Growth potential exists through expanding service offerings and enhancing digital engagement. Partnerships appear limited to internal subsidiaries and the parent company, with no external commercial partners identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious analytics configurations such as IP anonymization. The presence of a cookie consent banner and GDPR-compliant contact form indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The use of third-party scripts (Google Analytics, Hotjar, JivoSite) introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a healthcare service website but could be improved by implementing additional security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a formal vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security collaboration.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance WHOIS data transparency by ensuring domain registration details are accessible and up to date to build trust with users and partners.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Latvijas Amerikas acu centrs
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Amerikas acu centrs
Description
Redzes ekselences centrs is a network of branches created by Latvijas Amerikas acu centrs (LAAC) in Latvia offering comprehensive eye care and vision correction services including glasses, contact lenses, night lenses, laser correction, and lens implantation. LAAC is the first private eye clinic in the Baltics founded in 1993, providing high-level medical services to local and international patients.
Key services
Eye and vision diagnostics, Glasses and contact lenses, Night lenses, Laser vision correction (LASIK, FEMTO LASIK, TRANS EPI LASIK, SMILE), Lens implantation (EVO Visian ICL, multifocal lenses), Ophthalmological treatments and surgeries
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, JivoSite chat widget, Bootstrap (navbar, modal), Slick slider
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • GDPR consent checkbox on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
JivoSite chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple service descriptions.
  2. Strong focus on eye care and vision correction services in Latvia.
  3. Multiple physical clinic locations with addresses and contact details provided.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error, limiting domain registration verification.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Contact form includes GDPR consent checkbox.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, Slick slider for image galleries, and integrates multiple analytics and user engagement tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and JivoSite live chat. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and image assets. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Technical debt appears low with no visible broken elements or errors. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility features and implement advanced security headers to reduce technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional healthcare service website with room for security and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with manaredze.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review manaredze.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.